From: "Glauber Costa" <glommer@gmail.com>
To: "Max Kellermann" <mk@cm4all.com>
Cc: "Glauber Costa" <glommer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ijc@hellion.org.uk,
"Grant Coady" <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>,
"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"Tom Tucker" <tom@opengridcomputing.com>,
gorcunov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 11:15:56 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d6222a80810200615k60d6f523p9bcd71d8cb070a39@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081020065149.GA11213@rabbit.intern.cm-ag>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com> wrote:
> On 2008/10/17 16:33, Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com> wrote:
>> That's probably something related to apic congestion.
>> Does the problem go away if the only thing you change is this:
>>
>>
>> > @@ -891,11 +897,6 @@ do_rest:
>> > store_NMI_vector(&nmi_high, &nmi_low);
>> >
>> > smpboot_setup_warm_reset_vector(start_ip);
>> > - /*
>> > - * Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors.
>> > - */
>> > - apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
>> > - apic_read(APIC_ESR);
>> > }
>>
>>
>> Please let me know.
>
> Hello Glauber,
>
> I have rebooted the server with 2.6.27.1 + this patchlet an hour ago.
> No problems since.
>
> Hardware: Compaq P4 Xeon server, Broadcom CMIC-WS / CIOB-X2 board.
> Tell me if you need more detailed information.
>
There's a patch in flight from cyrill that probably fixes your problem:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/15/93
The checks are obviously there for a reason, and we can't just wipe
them out unconditionally ;-) So can you check please that you are also
covered by the case provided?
> On 2008/10/20 08:27, Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk> wrote:
>> The issue I see still occurs well before those changesets. I have
>> seen it with v2.6.25 but v2.6.24 survived for 7 days without issue
>> (my threshold for a good kernel is 7 days, hence bisecting is a bit
>> slow...).
>
> Hello Ian,
>
> it seems we're hunting down different bugs after all. Too bad, I
> hoped I could have solved your problem, too. Our machine has been
> running well over the weekend with the patch I posted; with faulty
> kernels, the problem would occur after a few minutes.
>
> Max
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Glauber Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 12:32 Max Kellermann
2008-10-17 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2008-10-20 6:51 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 7:43 ` Ian Campbell
2008-10-20 13:15 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2008-10-20 14:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 14:34 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-20 14:21 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-05-22 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-05-25 13:12 ` Max Kellermann
2008-10-20 6:27 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 11:45 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-01 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-02 14:40 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-07 2:12 ` kenneth johansson
2008-11-04 19:10 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 7:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 13:38 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-25 13:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-11-25 14:04 ` Ian Campbell
2008-11-26 22:12 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-01 0:17 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:27 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 18:08 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 18:59 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] SUNRPC: We only need to call svc_delete_xprt() once Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 0:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] SUNRPC: svc_xprt_enqueue should not refuse to enqueue 'XPT_DEAD' transports Trond Myklebust
2008-12-17 15:35 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-17 19:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-23 14:49 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-23 23:39 ` Tom Tucker
2008-12-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds" Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 15:22 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 15:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-02 16:26 ` Kasparek Tomas
2008-12-02 18:10 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-12-01 22:09 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-06 12:16 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-14 18:24 ` Ian Campbell
2008-12-16 17:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-16 18:39 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-07 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 18:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-08 21:22 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-08 21:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-01-12 9:46 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 8:27 ` Ian Campbell
2009-01-22 16:44 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5d6222a80810200615k60d6f523p9bcd71d8cb070a39@mail.gmail.com \
--to=glommer@gmail.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
--cc=ijc@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mk@cm4all.com \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®