From: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@public-files.de>,
Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 net-next] net: ethernet: mtk_ppe_offload: Allow QinQ
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:24:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5de748b1-5963-495e-ab90-6453c1707c39@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241014085122.GN77519@kernel.org>
On 10/14/24 10:51 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 08:50:56PM +0200, Eric Woudstra wrote:
>> mtk_foe_entry_set_vlan() in mtk_ppe.c already seems to support
>> double vlan tagging, but mtk_flow_offload_replace() in
>> mtk_ppe_offload.c only allows for 1 vlan tag, optionally in
>> combination with pppoe and dsa tags.
>>
>> This patch adds QinQ support to mtk_flow_offload_replace().
>>
>> Only PPPoE-in-Q (as before) and Q-in-Q are allowed. A combination
>> of PPPoE and Q-in-Q is not allowed.
>>
>> As I do not have any documentation of the ppe hardware, I do not
>> know if there is any other reason to not implement Q-in-Q in
>> mtk_flow_offload_replace().
>>
>> Tested on the BPI-R3(mini), on non-dsa-ports and dsa-ports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I see that this patch supports up to two VLANs, both with EtherType 0x8100.
> And assuming that is supported by the hardware, that seems fine to me.
>
> But I winder if you know if this hardware supports other VLAN EtherTypes,
> such as 0x88a8 which is described in 802.1ad?
Hello Simon,
The issue is that I do not have the documentation. Therefore I submit
this patch as RFC and I hope someone at mediatek or so can confirm we can
implement QinQ as in this patch on all hardware that uses mtk_ppe_offload.
But it does not look like it supports 0x88a8 from 802.1ad.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-15 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-13 18:50 Eric Woudstra
2024-10-14 8:51 ` Simon Horman
2024-10-15 15:24 ` Eric Woudstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5de748b1-5963-495e-ab90-6453c1707c39@gmail.com \
--to=ericwouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frank-w@public-files.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®