From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B79C433E0
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:07:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7C164DD8
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:07:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S230183AbhBJNGy (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:06:54 -0500
Received: from smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.10]:43534 "EHLO
        smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
        by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231765AbhBJNEw (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:04:52 -0500
Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60])
        by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD91318023912;
        Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:04:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D
X-HE-Tag: fish41_140b27927610
X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2507
Received: from [192.168.1.159] (unknown [47.151.137.21])
        (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com)
        by omf15.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA;
        Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:04:08 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5e1e5415dc1bcda37df3ce07a18827172c2a5b7f.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] vsprintf: dump full information of page flags in
 pGp
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, penberg@kernel.org,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:04:07 -0800
In-Reply-To: <YCPWypWctDMGWUpA@alley>
References: <20210209105613.42747-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
         <20210209105613.42747-4-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <YCKT8WCPGU+HBY91@alley>
         <CALOAHbBO6gXzbXjnH_EPsk4v-AdEQNhwNez7mbM6oTaut1pokw@mail.gmail.com>
         <YCPWypWctDMGWUpA@alley>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 13:51 +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Wed 2021-02-10 00:21:37, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:53 PM Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
[]
> >  for (p = pff; p < pff + ARRAY_SIZE(pff); p++) {
> 
> This looks a bit non-standard. IMHO, Joe was not against using index.
> He proposed:
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pfl) && buf < end; i++) {
> 
> , see
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e5ea9e8b1190c2a397a1b84dd55bb9c706dc7058.camel@perches.com/
> 
> I am not sure about the (buf < end) check. It might be some
> optimization or it did fit the the old code.

I believe the buf < end bit was broken anyway.

I believe vsprintf is supposed to return the maximum possible length
of the output and the function should not restrict that.  The
function should not write beyond the specified end.
 
> Anyway, I like the currently used:
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pff); i++) {
> 
> It is standard, easy to understand, and thus more safe. I am sure that
> compiler will optimize it very well.

true.