From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
To: Matt Ayres <matta@tektonic.net>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Panic in ipt_do_table with 2.6.16.13-xen
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:27:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e589307bfef58553bfda1d7ab47f9f3@cl.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44737D53.9050006@tektonic.net>
On 23 May 2006, at 22:23, Matt Ayres wrote:
>> Having looked at disassembly, the fault happens when accessing
>> e->ip.invflags in ip_packet_match() inlined inside ipt_do_table().
>> e = private->entries[smp_processor_id()] +
>> private->hook_entry[NF_IP_FORWARD]
>> smp_processor_id() should be 0 (since the oops appears to occur on
>> cpu0) and presumably all the ipt_entry structures are static once set
>> up. Since this crash happens on a common path in ipt_do_table(), and
>> since it happens only after the system has been up a while (I
>> believe?), it rather looks as though something has either corrupted a
>> pointer or unmapped memory from under iptables' feet.
>
> As the concerned user, what does this mean to me? It will only affect
> SMP systems? It is a bug in Xen or netfilter?
Probably a Xen bug, but if so then it's basically a memory corruption.
It's weird it would hit the iptables rules every time though, and not
be a more random crash. This might well need reproducing in a developer
test-machine environment to stand a chance of tracking down.
-- Keir
> I'd just like to understand what is going on.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-23 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-15 17:46 Matt Ayres
2006-05-15 19:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-16 0:01 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-16 3:31 ` James Morris
2006-05-16 13:49 ` [Xen-devel] " Matt Ayres
2006-05-16 15:28 ` James Morris
2006-05-18 23:58 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-19 0:05 ` James Morris
2006-05-19 0:16 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-19 0:45 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-21 17:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-22 14:31 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-22 14:42 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-22 14:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-23 9:54 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-23 12:03 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-23 21:15 ` Keir Fraser
2006-05-23 21:23 ` Matt Ayres
2006-05-23 21:27 ` Keir Fraser [this message]
2006-05-24 7:16 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e589307bfef58553bfda1d7ab47f9f3@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--to=keir.fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matta@tektonic.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®