From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com>, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
weidong.huang@huawei.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com,
wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com, longpeng.mike@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: expand ->arch.apic_arb_prio to u64
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 15:08:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e5d4edc-5861-b3d9-b4a2-890c9bbd53e0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502192234-14068-1-git-send-email-longpeng2@huawei.com>
On 08/08/2017 13:37, Longpeng(Mike) wrote:
> Currently 'apic_arb_prio' is int32_t, it's too short for long
> time running. In our environment, it overflowed and then the
> UBSAN was angry:
>
> signed integer overflow:
> 2147483647 + 1 cannot be represented in type 'int'
> CPU: 22 PID: 31237 Comm: qemu-kvm Tainted: ...
> ...
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff81f030b6>] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20
> [<ffffffff81f03173>] ubsan_epilogue+0x12/0x55
> [<ffffffff81f04658>] handle_overflow+0x1ba/0x215
> [<ffffffff81f046dd>] __ubsan_handle_add_overflow+0x2a/0x31
> [<ffffffffa126cb1a>] __apic_accept_irq+0x57a/0x5d0 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa126d14f>] kvm_apic_set_irq+0x9f/0xf0 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa126db20>] kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic_fast+0x450/0x910 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa127d8ea>] kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic+0xfa/0x7a0 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa127e039>] kvm_set_msi+0xa9/0x100 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa12871ed>] kvm_send_userspace_msi+0x14d/0x1f0 [kvm]
> [<ffffffffa11ed56e>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x4ee/0xdd0 [kvm]
> ...
>
> We expand it to u64, this is large enough. Suppose the vcpu receives
> 1000 irqs per second, then it won't overflow in 584942417 years.
> ( 18446744073709551615/1000/3600/24/365 = 584942417 )
Since you only look at the difference, changing it to uint32_t should be
enough.
Paolo
> Signed-off-by: Longpeng(Mike) <longpeng2@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h | 3 ++-
> arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 87ac4fb..ce9a5f5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> bool apicv_active;
> DECLARE_BITMAP(ioapic_handled_vectors, 256);
> unsigned long apic_attention;
> - int32_t apic_arb_prio;
> + u64 apic_arb_prio;
> int mp_state;
> u64 ia32_misc_enable_msr;
> u64 smbase;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
> index 29ce197..a26deed 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
> @@ -117,7 +117,8 @@ static inline int ioapic_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
> void kvm_rtc_eoi_tracking_restore_one(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> bool kvm_apic_match_dest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_lapic *source,
> int short_hand, unsigned int dest, int dest_mode);
> -int kvm_apic_compare_prio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu2);
> +/* Return true if vcpu1's priority is lower */
> +bool kvm_apic_compare_prio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu2);
> void kvm_ioapic_update_eoi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int vector,
> int trigger_mode);
> int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> index 3cc3b2d..03b1487 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/irq_comm.c
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ int kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic *src,
> if (!kvm_vector_hashing_enabled()) {
> if (!lowest)
> lowest = vcpu;
> - else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(vcpu, lowest) < 0)
> + else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio(vcpu, lowest))
> lowest = vcpu;
> } else {
> __set_bit(i, dest_vcpu_bitmap);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 589dcc1..1e2b1f2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_apic_map_get_dest_lapic(struct kvm *kvm,
> if (lowest < 0)
> lowest = i;
> else if (kvm_apic_compare_prio((*dst)[i]->vcpu,
> - (*dst)[lowest]->vcpu) < 0)
> + (*dst)[lowest]->vcpu))
> lowest = i;
> }
> } else {
> @@ -1048,9 +1048,9 @@ static int __apic_accept_irq(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int delivery_mode,
> return result;
> }
>
> -int kvm_apic_compare_prio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu2)
> +bool kvm_apic_compare_prio(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu1, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu2)
> {
> - return vcpu1->arch.apic_arb_prio - vcpu2->arch.apic_arb_prio;
> + return vcpu1->arch.apic_arb_prio < vcpu2->arch.apic_arb_prio;
> }
>
> static bool kvm_ioapic_handles_vector(struct kvm_lapic *apic, int vector)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 11:37 Longpeng(Mike)
2017-08-08 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2017-08-08 13:50 ` Longpeng (Mike)
2017-08-08 13:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-09 0:59 ` Longpeng (Mike)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e5d4edc-5861-b3d9-b4a2-890c9bbd53e0@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=arei.gonglei@huawei.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longpeng.mike@gmail.com \
--cc=longpeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=weidong.huang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®