Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: replace __vlan_hwaccel_put_tag with skb_vlan_push

[Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>]

On 23/08/2021 12:12, Kangmin Park wrote:
> 2021년 8월 23일 (월) 오후 6:00, Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>님이 작성:
>>
>> On 23/08/2021 09:19, Kangmin Park wrote:
>>
>> This changes behaviour though, I don't like changing code just for the sake of it.
>> Perhaps the author had a reason to use hwaccel_put_tag instead. Before we would
>> just put hwaccel tag, now if there already is hwaccel tag we'll push it inside
>> the skb and then push the new tag in hwaccel. In fact I think you can even trigger
>> the warning inside skb_vlan_push, so:
>>
>> Nacked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>
>>
>>
> 
> Thanks for the review. I got it.
> Then, how about cleanup by changing return type of
> br_handle_ingress_vlan_tunnel()?
> This function is only referenced in br_handle_frame(), and goto drop
> when it return
> non-zero. But, the ingress function always return 0, there is no
> meaning for now.
> If you think the cleanup is worth it, I'll send you a v2 patch.
> 
> Regards.
> 

Sure, I don't mind that cleanup.

Cheers,
 Nik