From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ixp4xx_eth: Support changing the MTU
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:42:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee77d8e-c5f1-cf53-268c-dc74fd3e37b6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbcMCXg8H8SsuhPSvvtdqD1reNxpCiFv5eD=gPYKUyr9A@mail.gmail.com>
On 9/25/2023 11:44 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 12:29 AM Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> wrote:
>
>>> +/* MRU is said to be 14320 in a code dump, the SW manual says that
>>> + * MRU/MTU is 16320 and includes VLAN and ethernet headers.
>>> + * See "IXP400 Software Programmer's Guide" section 10.3.2, page 161.
>>> + *
>>> + * FIXME: we have chosen the safe default (14320) but if you can test
>>> + * jumboframes, experiment with 16320 and see what happens!
>>> + */
>>
>> Ok, so you're choosing a conservative upper limit that is known to work
>> while leaving the higher 16320 value for later if/when someone cares?
>
> Mostly if someone can test it. But maybe I can have authoritative
> information from Intel that the statement in the Software Programmers
> Guide is correct? ;)
>
Unfortunately I'm one of the folks who worked on this driver/hardware,
so I can't comment.
>>> +static int ixp4xx_do_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
>>> +{
>>> + struct port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> + struct npe *npe = port->npe;
>>> + struct msg msg;
>>> + /* adjust for ethernet headers */
>>> + int framesize = new_mtu + VLAN_ETH_HLEN;
>>> + /* max rx/tx 64 byte chunks */
>>> + int chunks = DIV_ROUND_UP(framesize, 64);
>>> +
>>
>> netdev coding style wants all of the declarations in "reverse christmas
>> tree" ordering. Assign to the local variables after the block if
>> necessary. Something like:
>>
>> struct port *port = netdev_priv(dev);
>> struct npe *npe = port->npe;
>> int framesize, chunks;
>> struct msg msg;
>>
>> /* adjust for ethernet headers */
>> framesize = new_mtu + VLAN_ETH_HLEN;
>> /* max rx/tx 64 byte chunks */
>> chunks = DIV_ROUND_UP(framesize, 64);
>
> Right, I fix!
>
>>> + memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
>>
>> You could also use "struct msg msg = {}" instead of memset here.
>
> OK
>
>>> + msg.cmd = NPE_SETMAXFRAMELENGTHS;
>>> + msg.eth_id = port->id;
>>> +
>>> + /* Firmware wants to know buffer size in 64 byte chunks */
>>> + msg.byte2 = chunks << 8;
>>> + msg.byte3 = chunks << 8;
>>
>> I am not sure I follow the "<< 8" here.
>
> I actually only have this vendor code, but clearly <<8 is not
> "multiply by 256" in this case, rather that the number of 64 byte
> chunks is in the second byte.
>
> The software manual just describes a "OS abstraction layer"
> used by both VXworks and Linux, and since that wasn't acceptable
> in the Linux driver, someone has ripped out the code to
> talk directly to the NPE firmware, and that is what we are seeing.
> If you have the source code to the abstraction layer
> "ixEthAcc" or the source code to the NPE microcode, I think the
> answer is in there... (I have neither, maybe you can check internally,
> hehe. Dan Williams used to work with this hardware!)
>
Yea. We could use FIELD_PREP and some definitions, but I think its ok as-is.
>> Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
>>> base-commit: 0bb80ecc33a8fb5a682236443c1e740d5c917d1d
>>> change-id: 20230923-ixp4xx-eth-mtu-c041d7efe932
>>
>> Curious what this change-id thing represents I've never seen it before..
>> I know base-commit is used by git. Would be interested in an explanation
>> if you happen to know! :D
>
> It's metadata generated by b4 which is the tool we use for kernel mailing
> list handling:
> https://people.kernel.org/monsieuricon/sending-a-kernel-patch-with-b4-part-1
>
> I think this change ID cross-references mails I send with my
> git branch, so it's easy to collect review tags etc.
>
Neat! thanks for explaining :) b4 seems quite excellent :D
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 7:09 Linus Walleij
2023-09-25 22:29 ` Jacob Keller
2023-09-26 6:44 ` Linus Walleij
2023-09-26 21:42 ` Jacob Keller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ee77d8e-c5f1-cf53-268c-dc74fd3e37b6@intel.com \
--to=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®