From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D104C433EF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 09:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237905AbiCBJcv (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 04:32:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42842 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240548AbiCBJcq (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2022 04:32:46 -0500 Received: from mxout04.lancloud.ru (mxout04.lancloud.ru [45.84.86.114]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EE36BDE63; Wed, 2 Mar 2022 01:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from LanCloud DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mxout04.lancloud.ru E268D20C4F7F Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Received: from LanCloud Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh: avoid using IRQ0 on SH3/4 To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Rich Felker , , CC: Yoshinori Sato References: <2f419ed2-66b8-4098-7cd3-0fe698d341c9@omp.ru> <63f06bf0-fc7b-3c5c-8af9-5adfd7628354@omp.ru> <9671b75b-d0c4-7967-a543-5eebdf942b35@omp.ru> From: Sergey Shtylyov Organization: Open Mobile Platform Message-ID: <5f1b5b0b-8924-c704-eb47-ad806f031754@omp.ru> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2022 12:31:49 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.11.198] X-ClientProxiedBy: LFEXT02.lancloud.ru (fd00:f066::142) To LFEX1907.lancloud.ru (fd00:f066::207) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! On 2/26/22 11:07 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] >>>> I can test your revised patch next week on my SH7785LCR. >>> >>> Please do, although testing on the AP-SH4A* bords would be a bit more >>> interesting, as they actually use IRQ0 for the SMSC911x chip... >> >> So, were you finally able to test it? > > Not yet, sorry. Machine is currently offline due to a power outage and I cannot > turn it back on remotely, I'm not home until tomorrow. I will be able to test > it tomorrow, however. And? :-) > Adrian MBR, Sergey