mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: "David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
	"Gwendal Grignou" <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: proximity: sx9310: keep the IRQ balanced across suspend and resume
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:32:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f21c0f1-39cd-42ee-b091-4b1dad06c1a9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026100322.16720-1-kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>

On 26/10/2026 11:03, Arnav Kapoor wrote:
> sx9310_suspend() disables the interrupt first and returns with it still
> disabled if a register access fails. Resume isn't called after a failed
> suspend, so the interrupt is never enabled again. sx9310_resume() also
> returns without enabling it on error. Without an interrupt line,
> client->irq is 0 and both callbacks act on IRQ 0, which the driver
> doesn't own.
> 
> Disable the interrupt only once the device is asleep, always enable it
> in resume, and skip both when there is no interrupt.
> 
> Fixes: 72ad02b15d63 ("iio: Add SEMTECH SX9310/9311 sensor driver")
> Signed-off-by: Arnav Kapoor <kapoorarnav43@gmail.com>
> ---
> I'm sending the same fix for sx9310, sx9324 and sx9360 as separate
> patches, as the Fixes tags differ.
> 

Please group them in patchset to make reviewing and applying easier. Or
rejecting, or even commenting that something is wrong. Previously you
were sending AI slop and this resembles recent AI-bot spamming.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-27 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-26 10:03 Arnav Kapoor
2026-10-26 10:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-27 15:32 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f21c0f1-39cd-42ee-b091-4b1dad06c1a9@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kapoorarnav43@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®