From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-98.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-98.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36253A8723 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.98 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784198803; cv=none; b=mvr/18ymEuvkmvRsns+pSlx2imJGRNku2i383wj3y/2EMPg2DNDmj//4V7wC8xoQiciqiJDX9rGBHJo4Pdo7f3tcUB26yAZxSTkzGdMh+HI/jBSUiLL03QVGzVApcTVDnGM4wBeI47Z3UbEsEI0B0dYJ0ZWyJyI9UXiT+2aH9co= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784198803; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OOq28qwcse5SQ7ORd2r9ribdsgfuookgyEHQTmEi38Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=PyL9PmQRDdzvII0THlVoHtzlI8xu34UPjQHu1tHzaBGd9yF6wBJN+Q04ldtKjYVmyUc6yuXoGmgSOM5FjLACj2HBTlCEXoRAUX2nI8RlJjwE2clrsgKLvcPfc6bAQvPpef3qMrQfHXn1f6ttL6Nvy28frDXQcaaErVHAeZNYtiE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=DidGSL47; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.98 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="DidGSL47" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1784198791; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=z2e24JcVi84RXCgGQTG7+PHh4Tj/SHur87NM9gxSnaA=; b=DidGSL472szx0Kp0SnmK1cQPYTd0KUhjCjCDTlmbdwJJzKJttGURtndE99FixM0PvD0KFaxRn+l916xkrGYdbnphw4eR8aghPcVXCHG73o4RkMBLU1/qoHD9IUvjQdQkC6nfJcojloxoL8Ar/uiS/7sCWeyXhmT5ZbjhHidZttM= X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R521e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033037026112;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=21;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0X7E6b9Q_1784198789; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0X7E6b9Q_1784198789 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:46:29 +0800 From: Baolin Wang To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org Cc: riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org, harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev, kasong@tencent.com, qi.zheng@linux.dev, shakeel.butt@linux.dev, baohua@kernel.org, axelrasmussen@google.com, yuanchu@google.com, weixugc@google.com, mhocko@kernel.org, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: vmscan: convert folio_referenced() to use vma_flags_t Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:46:18 +0800 Message-ID: <5f2c0400e6a58ad2e61cf355c310a37b208fe1db.1784197559.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.5 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Replace use of the legacy vm_flags_t flags with vma_flags_t values for folio_referenced() and related logic. This is also a preparation for the following changes. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang --- include/linux/rmap.h | 7 +++---- mm/rmap.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- mm/vmscan.c | 14 +++++++------- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h index 8dc0871e5f00..e090aa09825d 100644 --- a/include/linux/rmap.h +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static inline int folio_try_share_anon_rmap_pmd(struct folio *folio, * Called from mm/vmscan.c to handle paging out */ int folio_referenced(struct folio *, int is_locked, - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, vm_flags_t *vm_flags); + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, vma_flags_t *vma_flags); void try_to_migrate(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags flags); void try_to_unmap(struct folio *, enum ttu_flags flags); @@ -975,10 +975,9 @@ struct anon_vma *folio_lock_anon_vma_read(const struct folio *folio, #define anon_vma_prepare(vma) (0) static inline int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked, - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, - vm_flags_t *vm_flags) + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, vma_flags_t *vma_flags) { - *vm_flags = 0; + vma_flags_clear_all(vma_flags); return 0; } diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index e854679553b9..4085540b6a25 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -907,7 +907,7 @@ pmd_t *mm_find_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address) struct folio_referenced_arg { int mapcount; int referenced; - vm_flags_t vm_flags; + vma_flags_t vma_flags; struct mem_cgroup *memcg; }; @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static bool folio_referenced_one(struct folio *folio, address = pvmw.address; nr = 1; - if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) { + if (vma_test(vma, VMA_LOCKED_BIT)) { ptes++; pra->mapcount--; @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static bool folio_referenced_one(struct folio *folio, /* Restore the mlock which got missed */ mlock_vma_folio(folio, vma); page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw); - pra->vm_flags |= VM_LOCKED; + vma_flags_set(&pra->vma_flags, VMA_LOCKED_BIT); return false; /* To break the loop */ } @@ -1015,8 +1015,11 @@ static bool folio_referenced_one(struct folio *folio, referenced++; if (referenced) { + vma_flags_t vma_flags = vma->flags; + pra->referenced++; - pra->vm_flags |= vma->vm_flags & ~VM_LOCKED; + vma_flags_clear(&vma_flags, VMA_LOCKED_BIT); + vma_flags_set_mask(&pra->vma_flags, vma_flags); } if (!pra->mapcount) @@ -1054,7 +1057,7 @@ static bool invalid_folio_referenced_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg) * @folio: The folio to test. * @is_locked: Caller holds lock on the folio. * @memcg: target memory cgroup - * @vm_flags: A combination of all the vma->vm_flags which referenced the folio. + * @vma_flags: A combination of all the vma->flags which referenced the folio. * * Quick test_and_clear_referenced for all mappings of a folio, * @@ -1062,7 +1065,7 @@ static bool invalid_folio_referenced_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma, void *arg) * the function bailed out due to rmap lock contention. */ int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked, - struct mem_cgroup *memcg, vm_flags_t *vm_flags) + struct mem_cgroup *memcg, vma_flags_t *vma_flags) { bool we_locked = false; struct folio_referenced_arg pra = { @@ -1078,7 +1081,7 @@ int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked, }; VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_is_zone_device(folio), folio); - *vm_flags = 0; + vma_flags_clear_all(vma_flags); if (!pra.mapcount) return 0; @@ -1092,7 +1095,7 @@ int folio_referenced(struct folio *folio, int is_locked, } rmap_walk(folio, &rwc); - *vm_flags = pra.vm_flags; + vma_flags_set_mask(vma_flags, pra.vma_flags); if (we_locked) folio_unlock(folio); diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 986dde8e7429..de62899c108d 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -861,16 +861,16 @@ static enum folio_references folio_check_references(struct folio *folio, struct scan_control *sc) { int referenced_ptes, referenced_folio; - vm_flags_t vm_flags; + vma_flags_t vma_flags; referenced_ptes = folio_referenced(folio, 1, sc->target_mem_cgroup, - &vm_flags); + &vma_flags); /* * The supposedly reclaimable folio was found to be in a VM_LOCKED vma. * Let the folio, now marked Mlocked, be moved to the unevictable list. */ - if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) + if (vma_flags_test(&vma_flags, VMA_LOCKED_BIT)) return FOLIOREF_ACTIVATE; /* @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static enum folio_references folio_check_references(struct folio *folio, /* * Activate file-backed executable folios after first usage. */ - if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) && folio_is_file_lru(folio)) + if (vma_flags_test(&vma_flags, VMA_EXEC_BIT) && folio_is_file_lru(folio)) return FOLIOREF_ACTIVATE; return FOLIOREF_KEEP; @@ -2065,7 +2065,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, { unsigned long nr_taken; unsigned long nr_scanned; - vm_flags_t vm_flags; + vma_flags_t vma_flags; LIST_HEAD(l_hold); /* The folios which were snipped off */ LIST_HEAD(l_active); LIST_HEAD(l_inactive); @@ -2109,7 +2109,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, /* Referenced or rmap lock contention: rotate */ if (folio_referenced(folio, 0, sc->target_mem_cgroup, - &vm_flags) != 0) { + &vma_flags) != 0) { /* * Identify referenced, file-backed active folios and * give them one more trip around the active list. So @@ -2119,7 +2119,7 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, * IO, plus JVM can create lots of anon VM_EXEC folios, * so we ignore them here. */ - if ((vm_flags & VM_EXEC) && folio_is_file_lru(folio)) { + if (vma_flags_test(&vma_flags, VMA_EXEC_BIT) && folio_is_file_lru(folio)) { nr_rotated += folio_nr_pages(folio); list_add(&folio->lru, &l_active); continue; -- 2.47.3