From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Stanley Jhu <stanleyjhu@google.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: Keep RPM_ACTIVE in blk_pre_runtime_resume() when already active
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 10:34:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f523a2c-c2ef-4285-9501-44d373569f7f@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104112744.1630864-1-stanleyjhu@google.com>
On 11/4/26 3:27 AM, Stanley Jhu wrote:
> Differences from v1:
> - Move SUSPENDED -> RESUMING explicitly in blk_pre_runtime_resume() and
> clear pm_only only for RPM_RESUMING in blk_post_runtime_resume()
Hi Stanley,
Thank you for having addressed my concerns. There is an existing
issues that you may want to address with a future patch: Queue ACTIVE,
device suspended: after a failed resume, the queue is ACTIVE with
pm_only == 0 while the device is still RPM_SUSPENDED. So
blk_pm_resume_queue() never asks for a resume, and normal I/O goes to
a device the PM core thinks is suspended. A retry only happens if
something else calls pm_runtime_get*(). Commit 6e1fcab00a23 introduced
this behavior on purpose.
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 11:27 Stanley Jhu
2026-11-04 14:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-11-04 18:34 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5f523a2c-c2ef-4285-9501-44d373569f7f@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=praveen.talari@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stanleyjhu@google.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®