From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C03134CFC4; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 08:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771835272; cv=none; b=QHbsYDrbvgdkMBauQPkdkrLraxei8nDML5QqBwBHPu4OcVOmPFggmQdB+qZg8FFk9dI6Og8TCurnnlBgtRA953M1wHBD27LnGy3ZDAiCNlmPZXd9vqWI3jexG2m36H8RqYqro40dPyuK5AsG/pYetpSrBhEfnBhZ79MafuwuM9o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771835272; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lz2l8y/OixmitdHTZL6EB6R3yGHwFZ8vgupr6hzLVlU=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=m+mBV6xoB57zwHB9nI951owpcN2e7cZHgvbZyUApbqXbGipkG2gwX5VFm567pe5FAtMMDKbftAUmmX3vSX9K5IoHYi0eJ3eBQu/1LjXwdEAZTvivURJsjLZKXPIJ9G0ZwF2kVB78IaOkOyMYT9bBrY0EtB2/0o47Y0UTeSvnmhc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=plPB0BQv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="plPB0BQv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=lz2l8y/OixmitdHTZL6EB6R3yGHwFZ8vgupr6hzLVlU=; t=1771835271; x=1773044871; b=plPB0BQvDrrpIPsIS3++FwpGJWZmZ7jPP3IrS7YFY3IjJ5w xmufHK8RCE2iHeoapTlou2qzR9cQl580w5hB5efZZFKc08rw76wqNcGq7a6RABQ3EXkvqsYgsiiBi uupQuP+NqS2qX9X7XAFHsFVcIOUA6trbItfGJF7y9VZ+Aaes0MWr6mmtZM9IOUo9ZdbshD/PDKGDH kCvE8DrJyhJWugpK0CluI60czgvzpL2Z+kdh6dCaV1ee53UfwHRDO1dvJDX9WIVg8VbrDeXcO2riJ Tk2gH8vYbPvSN4RknGEHLcZXKn5pxcvZAHz7CiW/xawlz2724+/UU3vtQgoqR/Jg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1vuRI7-0000000Gv0v-1B8Y; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:27:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5f7f9b57c0a3909509b6413c41883bb8aa12caf0.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: rt2x00: use non of nvmem_cell_get From: Johannes Berg To: Rosen Penev , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , open list Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 09:27:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20260220020908.40115-1-rosenp@gmail.com> References: <20260220020908.40115-1-rosenp@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.58.3 (3.58.3-1.fc43) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Thu, 2026-02-19 at 18:09 -0800, Rosen Penev wrote: > The library doesn't necessarily depend on OF. This codepath is used by > both soc (OF only) and pci (no such requirement). After this, the only > of specific function is of_get_mac_address, which is needed for nvmem. That makes sense, but at least to me the subject doesn't - can you please rewrite it? johannes