From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D5BC04A6A for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 06:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233105AbjHJGxo (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 02:53:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52230 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232911AbjHJGxm (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 02:53:42 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:242:246e::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91C610F5; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 23:53:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=dV0fS1M2Tqa/ji66e1+5uiGKbw4A0MVzF9K5dFXcc4U=; t=1691650421; x=1692860021; b=FNaLK8iuWWVLFdApVvXgNvwVt0unP9HfJrPI8lSCgIyn/zy zunDj3OAXcyBDRulXaRPi+k0SXaanq5W7MW2GDeDSlTFPmBeqlFnaxymZ4qB4f9sQqyCkBw9N5rE4 4duo1JqjwfTdQdS5WDP4f7lLW2YOVQlCQd/8YKKn3TqyRaiBmfbNgatPGeCVbBMy4+0nCv/NEabE7 4r3185sYJzU9g35B+O5i1IxDShxMqzP0gpc/U1rmlK7guNeAfRgpDt/u9sNAbcG4D4Vk7F3jgsky3 mGoFUlDitnoPrHJs9sytQTsIO54J8JJVmv1IG4ZgCCSqWfFDWyMMlUytNVm5HmAw==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qTzY2-00GJ9Z-1u; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:53:30 +0200 Message-ID: <5fcffcebca2ef9b8c276e5f4b4464d888649a70b.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: wireless: ralink: rt2x00: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar" From: Johannes Berg To: Bagas Sanjaya , hanyu001@208suo.com, stf_xl@wp.pl, helmut.schaa@googlemail.com, kvalo@kernel.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:53:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <18520fa625b8a901314c65bb8e557091@208suo.com> <36e36d94e81da4342283aac471fb5a7bd3eb9f65.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.4 (3.48.4-1.fc38) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2023-08-10 at 09:10 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > > And the email address doesn't even work, only about two weeks after you > > sent this patch? > >=20 > > hanyu001@208suo.com > > host mx1.qiye.aliyun.com [47.246.146.58] > > SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:: > > 554 RCPT (hanyu001@208suo.com) dosn't exist > >=20 >=20 > No wonder why @208suo.com people ignore reviews from mailing list - their > addresses are send-only without real mailboxes... >=20 > BTW, how can you get above error message? I'm curious. That was just the error message I got back from my mail server, presumably now that you actually tried emailing them, you also got one. I'm beginning to think we should just block that whole domain until someone there is actually willing to _interact_, not just throw (garbage!) patches over the fence. johannes