From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Juan Yescas <jyescas@google.com>, Dev Jain <Dev.Jain@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <David.Hildenbrand@arm.com>,
Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>,
Nanzhe Zhao <nzzhao@126.com>, Pengfei Li <lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>,
Ryan Roberts <Ryan.Roberts@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 16:09:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6045b4b3-26ef-4d12-b832-7affc9574df0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915041909.2903887-9-zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
On 9/15/26 12:19, Nanzhe Zhao wrote:
> The original f2fs_read_data_large_folio() implementation has limited
> benefit with a 4KB block size, mainly because updating
> read_pages_pending greatly increases the number of spinlock
> operations.
>
> Use len_blks to batch read_pages_pending and iostat updates for
> contiguous mapped blocks. If the contiguous mapping covers the whole
> folio, skip f2fs_folio_state allocation for that folio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nanzhe Zhao <zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/data.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 287d83debf95..09ad5cf0d9aa 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,9 @@ static void f2fs_finish_read_bio(struct bio *bio, bool in_task)
> continue;
> }
>
> - if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> - struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs = folio->private;
> + if (f2fs_folio_has_ffs(folio)) {
> + struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs =
> + (struct f2fs_folio_state *)folio->private;
I just notice that in somewhere, we missed to cast the private field to
f2fs_folio_state pointer as below, please take a look.
ffs = folio->private;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ffs->state_lock, flags);
> ffs->read_pages_pending -= nr_pages;
> @@ -2844,8 +2845,7 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> pgoff_t index, offset, next_pgofs = 0;
> unsigned max_nr_pages = rac ? readahead_count(rac) :
> folio_nr_pages(folio);
> - unsigned int nrpages;
> - struct f2fs_folio_state *ffs;
> + unsigned int nrpages, len_blks;
> int ret = 0;
> bool folio_in_bio = false;
>
> @@ -2868,11 +2868,17 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> folio_in_bio = false;
> index = folio->index;
> offset = 0;
> - ffs = NULL;
> nrpages = folio_nr_pages(folio);
>
> - for (; nrpages; nrpages--, max_nr_pages--, index++, offset++) {
> + for (; nrpages;
> + nrpages -= len_blks, max_nr_pages -= len_blks,
> + index += len_blks, offset += len_blks) {
> sector_t block_nr;
> + bool whole_folio_in_bio;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + len_blks = 1;
> +
> /*
> * Map blocks using the previous result first.
> */
> @@ -2901,13 +2907,31 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> got_it:
> if ((map.m_flags & F2FS_MAP_MAPPED)) {
> block_nr = map.m_pblk + index - map.m_lblk;
> - if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode), block_nr,
> +
> + len_blks = min_t(unsigned int, nrpages, max_nr_pages);
> + len_blks = min_t(unsigned int, len_blks,
> + (unsigned int)(map.m_lblk + map.m_len - index));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len_blks; i++) {
> + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> + block_nr + i,
> DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE_READ)) {
> - ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> - goto err_out;
> + ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * If an entire folio is added to one bio,
> + * folio_end_read() can complete the folio read status
> + * without relying on f2fs_folio_state.
> + */
> + whole_folio_in_bio = offset == 0 &&
> + len_blks == folio_nr_pages(folio);
> +
> } else {
> size_t page_offset = offset << PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> folio_zero_range(folio, page_offset, PAGE_SIZE);
> if (vi && !fsverity_verify_blocks(vi, folio, PAGE_SIZE, page_offset)) {
> ret = -EIO;
> @@ -2917,15 +2941,13 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> }
>
> /* We must increment read_pages_pending before possible BIOs submitting
> - * to prevent from premature folio_end_read() call on folio
> + * to prevent from premature folio_end_read() call on folio.
> */
> - if (folio_test_large(folio)) {
> - ffs = f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
> + if (folio_test_large(folio) && !whole_folio_in_bio) {
> + f2fs_ffs_find_or_alloc(folio);
Need to check return value?
Thanks,
>
> /* set the bitmap to wait */
> - spin_lock_irq(&ffs->state_lock);
> - ffs->read_pages_pending++;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&ffs->state_lock);
> + f2fs_update_read_folio_pending(folio, len_blks);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2949,17 +2971,20 @@ static int f2fs_read_data_large_folio(struct inode *inode,
> * If the page is under writeback, we need to wait for
> * its completion to see the correct decrypted data.
> */
> - f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(inode, block_nr);
> + for (i = 0; i < len_blks; i++)
> + f2fs_wait_on_block_writeback(inode, block_nr + i);
>
> - if (!bio_add_folio(bio, folio, F2FS_BLKSIZE(F2FS_I_SB(inode)),
> + if (!bio_add_folio(bio, folio,
> + len_blks * F2FS_BLKSIZE(F2FS_I_SB(inode)),
> offset << PAGE_SHIFT))
> goto submit_and_realloc;
>
> folio_in_bio = true;
> - inc_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_RD_DATA);
> + for (i = 0; i < len_blks; i++)
> + inc_page_count(F2FS_I_SB(inode), F2FS_RD_DATA);
> f2fs_update_iostat(F2FS_I_SB(inode), NULL, FS_DATA_READ_IO,
> - F2FS_BLKSIZE(F2FS_I_SB(inode)));
> - last_block_in_bio = block_nr;
> + len_blks * F2FS_BLKSIZE(F2FS_I_SB(inode)));
> + last_block_in_bio = block_nr + len_blks - 1;
> }
> trace_f2fs_read_folio(folio, DATA);
> err_out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-15 4:18 [PATCH v2 00/14] f2fs: support & optimize large folios for writable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:18 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] f2fs: extend folio state for large folio write path Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-16 9:53 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-15 4:18 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] f2fs: carry subpage offset and count in write IO Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:18 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] f2fs: support regular file buffered writes on large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-16 11:47 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-15 4:18 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] f2fs: support atomic file large folios buffered write Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-16 12:07 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-15 4:19 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] f2fs: support large folio writeback Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-17 3:48 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-15 4:19 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] f2fs: prepare mmap write faults for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-17 6:32 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-15 4:19 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] f2fs: make GC migration large-folio aware Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:19 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] f2fs: optimize small block size large folio read Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-16 4:33 ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2026-09-17 8:09 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-09-15 4:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] f2fs: support partial uptodate " Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:19 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] f2fs: handle partial truncate of large folio dirty subpages Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-17 8:30 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-17 8:32 ` Chao Yu
2026-09-15 4:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] f2fs: fix zeroing paths for large folios Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] f2fs: handle block cloning within the same large folio Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:25 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] f2fs: allow large folio support to writeable files Nanzhe Zhao
2026-09-15 4:25 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] f2fs: make compressed files compatible with large folio Nanzhe Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6045b4b3-26ef-4d12-b832-7affc9574df0@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=David.Hildenbrand@arm.com \
--cc=Dev.Jain@arm.com \
--cc=Ryan.Roberts@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jyescas@google.com \
--cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
--cc=nzzhao@126.com \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
--cc=zhaonanzhe@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®