From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>,
Ankit Agrawal <ankita@nvidia.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 16/23] dma-buf: Let importers ask how peer-to-peer traffic is routed
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 11:34:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <607e8903-a979-4d78-bf08-447321c03119@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928-fix-p2p-acs-v4-0-v8-16-404453b9c435@nvidia.com>
On 9/28/26 13:19, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Exporters keep the &struct p2pdma_provider backing a buffer in their own
> private data. An importer cannot reach it, so it has no way to learn how
> its own peer-to-peer traffic would be routed before it programs its
> hardware.
>
> Add an optional @p2pdma_provider callback for an exporter to hand that
> provider out, and dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type() for an importer to ask by TLP
> class. Exporters keep the provider where it already lives, so this adds an
> operation rather than changing any existing signature or structure.
>
> Tested-by: Tushar Dave <tdave@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dma-buf-mapping.h | 3 +++
> include/linux/dma-buf.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> index 794acff2546a..41702045f803 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf-mapping.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,45 @@
> #include <linux/dma-buf-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/dma-resv.h>
>
> +/**
> + * dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type - How peer-to-peer traffic to a buffer is routed
> + * @attach: attachment of the importer that will issue the traffic
> + * @tlp_flags: &enum pci_p2pdma_tlp_flags describing the TLPs it will issue
> + *
> + * Reports how the PCIe fabric routes @tlp_flags traffic between the buffer
> + * behind @attach and the importer attached to it, so that an importer can
> + * choose the TLP attributes that earn it a direct route before it programs
> + * its hardware.
> + *
> + * The caller must hold the reservation lock. The provider is owned by the
> + * exporter's driver binding, and exporters revoke under that lock before
> + * letting an unbind proceed, so dropping it any earlier would leave this
> + * racing a teardown that frees the provider.
> + *
> + * Return: the mapping type for @tlp_flags traffic, or PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE
> + * when the exporter names no &struct p2pdma_provider and nothing is known
> + * about the route.
> + */
> +enum pci_p2pdma_map_type
> +dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> + unsigned int tlp_flags)
> +{
> + struct dma_buf *dmabuf = attach->dmabuf;
> + struct p2pdma_provider *provider;
> +
> + dma_resv_assert_held(dmabuf->resv);
> +
> + if (!dmabuf->ops->p2pdma_provider)
> + return PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE;
> +
> + provider = dmabuf->ops->p2pdma_provider(dmabuf);
> + if (!provider)
> + return PCI_P2PDMA_MAP_NONE;
> +
> + return pci_p2pdma_map_type_tlp(provider, attach->dev, tlp_flags);
This function call here *must* be in the exporter and not the DMA-buf framework.
So clear NAK to putting that here.
Regards,
Christian.
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type, "DMA_BUF");
> +
> static struct scatterlist *fill_sg_entry(struct scatterlist *sgl, size_t length,
> dma_addr_t addr)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf-mapping.h b/include/linux/dma-buf-mapping.h
> index 09bde3f748e4..37b3da10b17a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf-mapping.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf-mapping.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,9 @@
> #define __DMA_BUF_MAPPING_H__
> #include <linux/dma-buf.h>
>
> +enum pci_p2pdma_map_type
> +dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> + unsigned int tlp_flags);
> struct sg_table *dma_buf_phys_vec_to_sgt(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
> struct p2pdma_provider *provider,
> struct phys_vec *phys_vec,
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> index d1203da56fc5..d56a48d41215 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> @@ -186,6 +186,25 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> * if the call would block.
> */
>
> + /**
> + * @p2pdma_provider:
> + *
> + * Returns the &struct p2pdma_provider backing this buffer, so that an
> + * importer can ask how its peer-to-peer traffic would be routed before
> + * it programs its hardware. Importers reach this through
> + * dma_buf_p2pdma_map_type() rather than calling it directly.
> + *
> + * Exporters of MMIO memory that is reachable peer-to-peer should
> + * implement this. Called with the &dma_buf.resv reservation lock held,
> + * which is what lets an exporter refuse once it has revoked the buffer
> + * and started tearing the provider down. This callback is optional.
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + *
> + * The provider backing the buffer.
> + */
> + struct p2pdma_provider *(*p2pdma_provider)(struct dma_buf *dmabuf);
> +
> /**
> * @release:
> *
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 11:19 [PATCH v8 00/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Route peer-to-peer DMA by TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 01/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Document the TLP attribute assumptions Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 02/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Derive routing from directional ACS controls Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 03/23] PCI: Reject unreadable ACS controls in isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 04/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate ACS controls at the path divergence Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 05/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Document directional ACS routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 06/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Collect the path's ACS controls before deciding Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 07/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Answer routing per TLP class Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 08/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Relaxed Ordering Completions directly Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 09/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Reject Translated Requests blocked by Translation Blocking Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 10/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Route Translated Requests under Direct Translated P2P Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 11/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Log detailed ACS routing diagnostics Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 12/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Add KUnit tests for the ACS routing decisions Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 13/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the ACS P2P routing walk Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 14/23] PCI: Add KUnit coverage for ACS isolation checks Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 15/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Document TLP-class routing Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 16/23] dma-buf: Let importers ask how peer-to-peer traffic is routed Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-29 9:34 ` Christian König [this message]
2026-09-29 13:23 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-29 13:39 ` Christian König
2026-09-29 17:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 17/23] vfio/pci: Hand out the P2PDMA provider behind a dma-buf Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 18/23] RDMA/uverbs: " Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 19/23] RDMA/mlx5: Ask P2PDMA whether ATS takes a direct peer-to-peer route Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 20/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Let a client declare that it selects ATS per mapping Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 12:44 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 21/23] RDMA/mlx5: Declare to P2PDMA that ATS is selected per memory key Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 22/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Evaluate the ATS path for clients with ATS enabled Leon Romanovsky
2026-09-28 12:43 ` Thomas Hellström
2026-09-28 11:19 ` [PATCH v8 23/23] PCI/P2PDMA: Test the routing of " Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=607e8903-a979-4d78-bf08-447321c03119@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tdave@nvidia.com \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®