From: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
"Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hu, Robert" <robert.hu@intel.com>,
"Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] KVM: x86: Allow userspace set maximum VCPU id for VM
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2022 18:17:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60879468-c54f-e7f1-2123-ba4cf4128ac3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YkZc7cMsDaR5S2hM@google.com>
On 4/1/2022 10:01 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2022, Zeng Guang wrote:
>> Introduce new max_vcpu_id in KVM for x86 architecture. Userspace
>> can assign maximum possible vcpu id for current VM session using
>> KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID of KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl().
>>
>> This is done for x86 only because the sole use case is to guide
>> memory allocation for PID-pointer table, a structure needed to
>> enable VMX IPI.
>>
>> By default, max_vcpu_id set as KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Guang <guang.zeng@intel.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 ++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++++++++++
> The new behavior needs to be documented in api.rst.
OK. I will prepare document for it.
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 6dcccb304775..db16aebd946c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -1233,6 +1233,12 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>> hpa_t hv_root_tdp;
>> spinlock_t hv_root_tdp_lock;
>> #endif
>> + /*
>> + * VM-scope maximum vCPU ID. Used to determine the size of structures
>> + * that increase along with the maximum vCPU ID, in which case, using
>> + * the global KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS may lead to significant memory waste.
>> + */
>> + u32 max_vcpu_id;
> This should be max_vcpu_ids. I agree the it _should_ be max_vcpu_id, but KVM's API
> for this is awful and we're stuck with the plural name.
>
>> };
>>
>> struct kvm_vm_stat {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 4f6fe9974cb5..ca17cc452bd3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -5994,6 +5994,13 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm,
>> kvm->arch.exit_on_emulation_error = cap->args[0];
>> r = 0;
>> break;
>> + case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
> I think it makes sense to change kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension() to return the
> current max, it is a VM-scoped ioctl after all.
kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension() can return kvm->arch.max_vcpu_ids
as it reflects runtime capability supported on current vm. I will
change it.
> Amusingly, I think we also need a capability to enumerate that KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
> is writable.
IIUC, KVM_CAP_* has intrinsic writable attribute. KVM will return invalid
If not implemented.
>> + if (cap->args[0] <= KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS) {
>> + kvm->arch.max_vcpu_id = cap->args[0];
> This needs to be rejected if kvm->created_vcpus > 0, and that check needs to be
> done under kvm_lock, otherwise userspace can bump the max ID after KVM allocates
> per-VM structures and trigger buffer overflow.
Is it necessary to use kvm_lock ? Seems no use case to call it from multi-threads.
>> + r = 0;
>> + } else
> If-elif-else statements need curly braces for all paths if any path needs braces.
> Probably a moot point for this patch due to the above changes.
>
>> + r = -E2BIG;
> This should be -EINVAL, not -E2BIG.
>
> E.g.
>
> case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
> r = -EINVAL;
> if (cap->args[0] > KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS)
> break;
>
> mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
> if (!kvm->created_vcpus) {
> kvm->arch.max_vcpu_id = cap->args[0];
> r = 0;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
> break;
>
>
>> + break;
>> default:
>> r = -EINVAL;
>> break;
>> @@ -11067,6 +11074,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> struct page *page;
>> int r;
>>
>> + if (vcpu->vcpu_id >= vcpu->kvm->arch.max_vcpu_id)
>> + return -E2BIG;
> Same here, it should be -EINVAL.
>
>> +
>> vcpu->arch.last_vmentry_cpu = -1;
>> vcpu->arch.regs_avail = ~0;
>> vcpu->arch.regs_dirty = ~0;
>> @@ -11589,6 +11599,7 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>> spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.hv_root_tdp_lock);
>> kvm->arch.hv_root_tdp = INVALID_PAGE;
>> #endif
>> + kvm->arch.max_vcpu_id = KVM_MAX_VCPU_IDS;
>>
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_update_work, kvmclock_update_fn);
>> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&kvm->arch.kvmclock_sync_work, kvmclock_sync_fn);
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-03 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-04 8:07 [PATCH v7 0/8] IPI virtualization support " Zeng Guang
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] x86/cpu: Add new VMX feature, Tertiary VM-Execution control Zeng Guang
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] KVM: VMX: Extend BUILD_CONTROLS_SHADOW macro to support 64-bit variation Zeng Guang
2022-03-31 22:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 12:47 ` Zeng Guang
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] KVM: VMX: Detect Tertiary VM-Execution control when setup VMCS config Zeng Guang
2022-03-31 22:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 12:58 ` Zeng Guang
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] KVM: VMX: dump_vmcs() reports tertiary_exec_control field as well Zeng Guang
2022-03-31 22:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 13:09 ` Zeng Guang
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] KVM: x86: Add support for vICR APIC-write VM-Exits in x2APIC mode Zeng Guang
2022-03-31 23:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-02 13:33 ` Zeng Guang
2022-04-04 15:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] KVM: x86: lapic: don't allow to change APIC ID unconditionally Zeng Guang
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] KVM: x86: Allow userspace set maximum VCPU id for VM Zeng Guang
2022-04-01 2:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-03 10:17 ` Zeng Guang [this message]
2022-04-04 17:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-04 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] KVM: VMX: enable IPI virtualization Zeng Guang
2022-04-01 2:37 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-03 14:38 ` Zeng Guang
2022-04-04 17:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-08 16:41 ` Zeng Guang
2022-04-15 14:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-03-18 8:15 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] IPI virtualization support for VM Zeng Guang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60879468-c54f-e7f1-2123-ba4cf4128ac3@intel.com \
--to=guang.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jethro@fortanix.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome