From: <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>
To: <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: <marek.vasut@gmail.com>, <vigneshr@ti.com>,
<miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <richard@nod.at>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mtd: spi-nor: move manuf out of the core - batch 0
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 13:02:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6098471f-ab8a-4887-7065-2d2266492ee8@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190825133853.32532641@collabora.com>
On 08/25/2019 02:38 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> External E-Mail
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 15:53:33 +0000
> <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
>>
>> This series is a prerequisite for the effort of moving the
>> manufacturer specific code out of the SPI NOR core.
>>
>> The scope is to move all [FLASH-SPECIFIC] parameters and settings
>> from 'struct spi_nor' to 'struct spi_nor_flash_parameter'. We will
>> have a clear separation between the SPI NOR layer and the flash
>> parameters and settings.
>>
>> 'struct spi_nor_flash_parameter' describes the hardware capabilities
>> and associated settings of the SPI NOR flash memory. It includes
>> legacy flash parameters and settings that can be overwritten by the
>> spi_nor_fixups hooks, or dynamically when parsing the JESD216
>> Serial Flash Discoverable Parameters (SFDP) tables. All SFDP params
>> and settings will fit inside 'struct spi_nor_flash_parameter'.
>
> While we're at moving things around, I think it'd make sense to move
> all '[DRIVER SPECIFIC]' fields (which are actually SPI NOR controller
> driver specific fields) to a separate struct:
>
> struct spi_nor_controller_ops {
> int (*prepare)(struct spi_nor *nor, enum spi_nor_ops ops);
> void (*unprepare)(struct spi_nor *nor, enum spi_nor_ops ops);
> int (*read_reg)(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len);
> int (*write_reg)(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 opcode, u8 *buf, int len);
> ssize_t (*read)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t from,
> size_t len, u_char *read_buf);
> ssize_t (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to,
> size_t len, const u_char *write_buf);
> int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs);
> };
>
> struct spi_nor {
> ...
> const struct spi_nor_controller_ops *controller_ops;
> ...
> };
Yep, this is a good idea. I'll make a patch and add your Suggested-by tag.
Thanks!
>
>>
>> Tested uniform and non-uniform erase on sst26vf064b flash using the
>> atmel-quadspi driver.
>>
>> In order to test this, you'll have to merge v5.3-rc5 in spi-nor/next.
>> This patch depends on
>> 'commit 834de5c1aa76 ("mtd: spi-nor: Fix the disabling of write protection at init")
>>
>> Tudor Ambarus (5):
>> mtd: spi-nor: Regroup flash parameter and settings
>> mtd: spi-nor: Use nor->params
>> mtd: spi-nor: Drop quad_enable() from 'struct spi-nor'
>> mtd: spi-nor: Move clear_sr_bp() to 'struct spi_nor_flash_parameter'
>> mtd: spi-nor: Move erase_map to 'struct spi_nor_flash_parameter'
>>
>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 236 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 254 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 2 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 221 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-25 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-23 15:53 Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-23 15:53 ` [PATCH 1/5] mtd: spi-nor: Regroup flash parameter and settings Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-25 11:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-23 15:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] mtd: spi-nor: Use nor->params Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-25 11:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-23 15:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: spi-nor: Drop quad_enable() from 'struct spi-nor' Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-25 11:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-23 15:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] mtd: spi-nor: Move clear_sr_bp() to 'struct spi_nor_flash_parameter' Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-24 3:53 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-25 11:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-25 13:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-25 13:19 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-25 13:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-23 15:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] mtd: spi-nor: Move erase_map " Tudor.Ambarus
2019-08-25 11:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2019-08-25 11:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] mtd: spi-nor: move manuf out of the core - batch 0 Boris Brezillon
2019-08-25 13:02 ` Tudor.Ambarus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6098471f-ab8a-4887-7065-2d2266492ee8@microchip.com \
--to=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome