From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E2CC3527E for ; Mon, 7 Feb 2022 05:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236330AbiBGFy4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2022 00:54:56 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37634 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242065AbiBGFvj (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Feb 2022 00:51:39 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AEFC0401D8 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2022 21:51:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C40ED6E; Sun, 6 Feb 2022 21:51:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.163.45.31] (unknown [10.163.45.31]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CEE43F718; Sun, 6 Feb 2022 21:51:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] Make ETM register accesses consistent with sysreg.h To: James Clark , suzuki.poulose@arm.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org Cc: leo.yan@linaro.com, mike.leach@linaro.org, Leo Yan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220203120604.128396-1-james.clark@arm.com> From: Anshuman Khandual Message-ID: <609d9678-e8c7-163f-86cf-0207c59db2c3@arm.com> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:21:18 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20220203120604.128396-1-james.clark@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi James, On 2/3/22 5:35 PM, James Clark wrote: > James Clark (15): > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCIDR0 register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCIDR2 register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCIDR3 register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCIDR4 register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCIDR5 register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCCONFIGR register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCEVENTCTL1R register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCSTALLCTLR register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCVICTLR register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM3x ETMTECR1 register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCACATRn register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCSSCCRn and TRCSSCSRn register accesses > consistent with sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCSSPCICRn register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCBBCTLR register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h > coresight: Make ETM4x TRCRSCTLRn register accesses consistent with > sysreg.h The changes here are very similar to each other. But they are split into different patches according to register names just for better review process ? OR is there any other rationale ? - Anshuman