Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] mtd: rawnand: support MT29F1G08ABAFAWP-ITE:F

["Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>]

Hi,  Boris
>>
>> Okay, I think we already had this discussion, but I'm asking it again.
>> What are the possible values for that field and what do they mean?
>
>Still, it's not clear to me what "Internal ECC level" means. It seems that NAND
>chips having on-die ECC have this field set to 10b (0x2), 00b seems to be
>reserved for "no on-die ECC", but what are 01b and 11b reserved for?
>

That position identifies the part as having Internal ECC capability.  
The 01b and 11b are reserved for future definition.  Bit 7 of READ ID Byte 4 identifies the
device as an ECC OFF 0x0 or ECC ON 0x1.

>> Also, is it even used to encode the fact that the NAND has on-die ECC
>> on all your NANDs? We already had the problem of incompatible ID
>> schemes, so I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case here, hence
>> my initial suggestion to base the detection on the model name.
>
>I'd really need to have an answer on that one to take a decision. Also, I
>couldn't find a datasheet for an IT (without E) version of the
>MT29F1G08ABAFAWP part. Does it exist, or can we assume
>MT29F1G08ABAFAWP chips always come with forcibly enabled on-die ECC?

MT29F1G08ABAFAWP comes in ECC ON only.  We didn’t develop a
MT29F1G08ABAFAWP ECC OFF version.  Bit 7 of READ ID Byte 4 identifies the
device as an ECC OFF 0x0 or ECC ON 0x1.