From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kvm: Don't use pv tlb/ipi/sched_yield if on 1 vCPU
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 09:36:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60c796c5-9a24-8e2a-b417-f0d7259029b2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1645171838-2855-1-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com>
On 2/18/22 09:10, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
>
> Inspired by commit 3553ae5690a (x86/kvm: Don't use pvqspinlock code if
> only 1 vCPU), on a VM with only 1 vCPU, there is no need to enable
> pv tlb/ipi/sched_yield and we can save the memory for __pv_cpu_mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index a438217cbfac..f734e3b0cfec 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -462,19 +462,22 @@ static bool pv_tlb_flush_supported(void)
> {
> return (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_TLB_FLUSH) &&
> !kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME) &&
> - kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME));
> + kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME) &&
> + (num_possible_cpus() != 1));
> }
>
> static bool pv_ipi_supported(void)
> {
> - return kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_SEND_IPI);
> + return (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_SEND_IPI) &&
> + (num_possible_cpus() != 1));
> }
>
> static bool pv_sched_yield_supported(void)
> {
> return (kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PV_SCHED_YIELD) &&
> !kvm_para_has_hint(KVM_HINTS_REALTIME) &&
> - kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME));
> + kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_STEAL_TIME) &&
> + (num_possible_cpus() != 1));
> }
>
> #define KVM_IPI_CLUSTER_SIZE (2 * BITS_PER_LONG)
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-18 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-18 8:10 Wanpeng Li
2022-02-18 8:36 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60c796c5-9a24-8e2a-b417-f0d7259029b2@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®