mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>, <borisp@nvidia.com>,
	<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tls: fix possible info leak in tls_set_device_offload()
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:25:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <60e2ed41-1c88-3780-e4c4-550cef8f7c91@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223090508.443157-1-hbh25y@gmail.com>

On 2023/2/23 17:05, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> After tls_set_device_offload() fails, we enter tls_set_sw_offload(). But
> tls_set_sw_offload can't set cctx->iv and cctx->rec_seq to NULL if it fails
> before kmalloc cctx->iv. This may cause info leak when we call
> do_tls_getsockopt_conf().

Should we use kfree_sensitive() here if info leaking is what we want to
avoid?

> 
> Fixes: e8f69799810c ("net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure")
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/tls/tls_device.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
> index 6c593788dc25..a63f6f727f58 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
> @@ -1241,8 +1241,10 @@ int tls_set_device_offload(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
>  	kfree(start_marker_record);
>  free_rec_seq:
>  	kfree(ctx->tx.rec_seq);
> +	ctx->tx.rec_seq = NULL;
>  free_iv:
>  	kfree(ctx->tx.iv);
> +	ctx->tx.iv = NULL;
>  release_netdev:
>  	dev_put(netdev);
>  	return rc;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-23  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-23  9:05 Hangyu Hua
2023-02-23  9:25 ` Yunsheng Lin [this message]
2023-02-23 11:15 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2023-02-24  3:07   ` Hangyu Hua
2023-02-24  3:33     ` Hangyu Hua
2023-02-24  7:57       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2023-02-24  9:35         ` Hangyu Hua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=60e2ed41-1c88-3780-e4c4-550cef8f7c91@huawei.com \
    --to=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hbh25y@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®