Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DSIPHY RPM

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>]

On 15.07.2023 17:25, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 11.07.2023 18:31, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 11/07/2023 17:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 13:43:19 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> Some recent SoCs use power rails that we model as GENPDs to power the
>>>> DSIPHY. This series attempts to make such configurations suspendable.
>>>>
>>>> Tested on SM6375.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied, thanks!
>>>
>>> [1/2] drm/msm/dsi: Use pm_runtime_resume_and_get to prevent refcnt leaks
>>>        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/a402e0e61b75
>>> [2/2] drm/msm/dsi: Enable runtime PM
>>>        https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/4e905c2acc9d
>>
>> Unfortunately this series breaks our CI, see [1], [2]. I had to remove these patches for now.
>>
>> I suppose this is either because of a probe deferral or because of having subset of drivers built as module. Konrad, could you please take a look?
> I see no reason why it would break things :/
> 
> You can see that rpmhpd sync_state has not completed, which means all
> PDs should still be pinned at max vote..
> 
> Can we somehow retest it?
> 
> If it still fails, can you try enabling runtime pm on dispcc and hooking
> up vddcx?
IIRC this was a fluke with the CI, can we retry?

Konrad