Re: [PATCH v5 net 1/3] rcu: add a helper to report consolidated flavor QS

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:44:34PM -0700, Yan Zhai wrote:
> When under heavy load, network processing can run CPU-bound for many
> tens of seconds. Even in preemptible kernels (non-RT kernel), this can
> block RCU Tasks grace periods, which can cause trace-event removal to
> take more than a minute, which is unacceptably long.
> 
> This commit therefore creates a new helper function that passes through
> both RCU and RCU-Tasks quiescent states every 100 milliseconds. This
> hard-coded value suffices for current workloads.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <yan@cloudflare.com>

If you would like me to take this one via -rcu, I would be happy to take
it.  If it would be easier for you to push these as a group though
networking:

Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

> ---
> v4->v5: adjusted kernel docs and commit message
> v3->v4: kernel docs error
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 16f519914415..17d7ed5f3ae6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -247,6 +247,37 @@ do { \
>  	cond_resched(); \
>  } while (0)
>  
> +/**
> + * rcu_softirq_qs_periodic - Report RCU and RCU-Tasks quiescent states
> + * @old_ts: jiffies at start of processing.
> + *
> + * This helper is for long-running softirq handlers, such as NAPI threads in
> + * networking. The caller should initialize the variable passed in as @old_ts
> + * at the beginning of the softirq handler. When invoked frequently, this macro
> + * will invoke rcu_softirq_qs() every 100 milliseconds thereafter, which will
> + * provide both RCU and RCU-Tasks quiescent states. Note that this macro
> + * modifies its old_ts argument.
> + *
> + * Because regions of code that have disabled softirq act as RCU read-side
> + * critical sections, this macro should be invoked with softirq (and
> + * preemption) enabled.
> + *
> + * The macro is not needed when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is defined. RT kernels would
> + * have more chance to invoke schedule() calls and provide necessary quiescent
> + * states. As a contrast, calling cond_resched() only won't achieve the same
> + * effect because cond_resched() does not provide RCU-Tasks quiescent states.
> + */
> +#define rcu_softirq_qs_periodic(old_ts) \
> +do { \
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && \
> +	    time_after(jiffies, (old_ts) + HZ / 10)) { \
> +		preempt_disable(); \
> +		rcu_softirq_qs(); \
> +		preempt_enable(); \
> +		(old_ts) = jiffies; \
> +	} \
> +} while (0)
> +
>  /*
>   * Infrastructure to implement the synchronize_() primitives in
>   * TREE_RCU and rcu_barrier_() primitives in TINY_RCU.
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
>