Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Add callback function pointer check before its call

[Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>]

On 08.04.2024 19:51, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/8/2024 1:55 AM, Aleksandr Mishin wrote:
>> In dpu_core_irq_callback_handler() callback function pointer is 
>> compared to NULL,
>> but then callback function is unconditionally called by this pointer.
>> Fix this bug by adding conditional return.
>>
>> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
>>
> 
> Yes , as dmitry wrote, this should be Reported-by.
> 

It is an established practice for our project, you can find 700+ applied
patches with similar line:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=grep&q=linuxtesting.org

> But rest LGTM.
> 
>> Fixes: c929ac60b3ed ("drm/msm/dpu: allow just single IRQ callback")
>> Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Mishin <amishin@t-argos.ru>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> index 946dd0135dff..03a16fbd4c99 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_interrupts.c
>> @@ -223,9 +223,11 @@ static void dpu_core_irq_callback_handler(struct 
>> dpu_kms *dpu_kms, unsigned int
>>       VERB("IRQ=[%d, %d]\n", DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
>> -    if (!irq_entry->cb)
>> +    if (!irq_entry->cb) {
>>           DRM_ERROR("no registered cb, IRQ=[%d, %d]\n",
>>                 DPU_IRQ_REG(irq_idx), DPU_IRQ_BIT(irq_idx));
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>>       atomic_inc(&irq_entry->count);

-- 
Kind regards
Aleksandr