From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Alexander E . Patrakov" <patrakov@gmail.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX v2 1/4] ACPI, DOCK: initialize dock subsystem before scanning PCI root buses
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:03:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6161178.guRcsL2k7p@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BC3C6B.9010908@gmail.com>
On Saturday, June 15, 2013 06:05:31 PM Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 06/15/2013 02:51 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> wrote:
> >> Changeset "3b63aaa70e1 PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver
> >> mechanism" causes a regression which breaks ACPI dock support,
> >> please refer to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
> >>
> >> The root cause is that changeset 3b63aaa70e1 changed the relative
> >> initialization order of ACPI dock subsystem and acpiphp driver,
> >> and acpiphp driver has dependency on ACPI dock subsystem's
> >> initialization result, so that acpiphp can't correctly detect ACPI
> >> dock stations now.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, ACPI dock is a built-in driver, so we could
> >> explicitly initialize it before the acpiphp driver is used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >> Reported-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
> >> Tested-by: Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
> >> ---
> >> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +------
> >> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +++++
> >> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 +
> >> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> >> index 4fdea38..02b0563 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> >> @@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ find_dock_and_bay(acpi_handle handle, u32 lvl, void *context, void **rv)
> >> return AE_OK;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -static int __init dock_init(void)
> >> +int __init acpi_dock_init(void)
> >> {
> >> if (acpi_disabled)
> >> return 0;
> >> @@ -1062,9 +1062,4 @@ static void __exit dock_exit(void)
> >> dock_remove(dock_station);
> >> }
> >>
> >> -/*
> >> - * Must be called before drivers of devices in dock, otherwise we can't know
> >> - * which devices are in a dock
> >> - */
> >> -subsys_initcall(dock_init);
> >> module_exit(dock_exit);
> >
> > why not remove dock_exit?
> I have a pending patchset to clean up dock driver, Rafael suggested to
> focus on bugfix first, so I will send out the clean up patchset later.
Well, you can remove dock_exit() in the same patch. This is kind of not
directly related to the fix, but since you're changing it from modular to
non-modular, it'd be prudent to remove all of the "modular" code in the
process.
Thanks,
Rafael
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> >> index 297cbf4..c610a76 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
> >> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ void acpi_container_init(void);
> >> #else
> >> static inline void acpi_container_init(void) {}
> >> #endif
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK
> >> +void acpi_dock_init(void);
> >> +#else
> >> +static inline void acpi_dock_init(void) {}
> >> +#endif
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY
> >> void acpi_memory_hotplug_init(void);
> >> #else
> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> index 44225cb..4148163 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >> @@ -2045,6 +2045,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> >> acpi_lpss_init();
> >> acpi_container_init();
> >> acpi_memory_hotplug_init();
> >> + acpi_dock_init();
> >>
> >> mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> >> /*
> >> --
> >> 1.8.1.2
> >>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-15 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 19:27 [BUGFIX v2 0/4] fix bug 56531, 59501 and 59581 Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 19:27 ` [BUGFIX v2 1/4] ACPI, DOCK: initialize dock subsystem before scanning PCI root buses Jiang Liu
2013-06-15 6:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-15 10:05 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-15 20:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-06-14 19:27 ` [BUGFIX v2 2/4] ACPI, DOCK: resolve possible deadlock scenarios Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-15 1:44 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-15 20:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-15 21:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-15 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-16 17:12 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-17 11:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-18 16:03 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-18 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-16 17:01 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-17 11:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-17 12:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-18 15:36 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-18 21:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-16 16:27 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 19:28 ` [BUGFIX v2 3/4] PCI, ACPI: fix device destroying order issue when handling dock notification Jiang Liu
2013-06-15 6:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-14 19:28 ` [BUGFIX v2 4/4] ACPIPHP: fix bug 56531 Sony VAIO VPCZ23A4R: can't assign mem/io after docking Jiang Liu
2013-06-14 21:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-17 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-15 6:42 ` [BUGFIX v2 0/4] fix bug 56531, 59501 and 59581 Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-15 7:25 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-18 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-19 5:18 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-20 19:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-21 4:36 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-21 4:37 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-21 13:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-21 12:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-21 13:02 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-21 16:54 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-22 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-22 2:47 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-22 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-23 15:57 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-23 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-23 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-16 17:33 ` Jiang Liu
2013-06-17 3:27 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-17 17:07 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2013-06-18 15:13 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6161178.guRcsL2k7p@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=patrakov@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®