From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Add tests for PKS
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:45:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6174185b-25e0-f2a2-3f71-d8bbe6ca889d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201105081805.5674-9-chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
On 05/11/2020 09.18, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> This unit-test is intended to test the KVM support for Protection Keys
> for Supervisor Pages (PKS). If CR4.PKS is set in long mode, supervisor
> pkeys are checked in addition to normal paging protections and Access or
> Write can be disabled via a MSR update without TLB flushes when
> permissions change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/x86/msr.h | 1 +
> lib/x86/processor.h | 2 +
> x86/Makefile.x86_64 | 1 +
> x86/pks.c | 146 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> x86/unittests.cfg | 5 ++
> 5 files changed, 155 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 x86/pks.c
>
> diff --git a/lib/x86/msr.h b/lib/x86/msr.h
> index 6ef5502..e36934b 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/msr.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/msr.h
> @@ -209,6 +209,7 @@
> #define MSR_IA32_EBL_CR_POWERON 0x0000002a
> #define MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL 0x0000003a
> #define MSR_IA32_TSC_ADJUST 0x0000003b
> +#define MSR_IA32_PKRS 0x000006e1
>
> #define FEATURE_CONTROL_LOCKED (1<<0)
> #define FEATURE_CONTROL_VMXON_ENABLED_INSIDE_SMX (1<<1)
> diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
> index 74a2498..985fdd0 100644
> --- a/lib/x86/processor.h
> +++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
> #define X86_CR4_SMEP 0x00100000
> #define X86_CR4_SMAP 0x00200000
> #define X86_CR4_PKE 0x00400000
> +#define X86_CR4_PKS 0x01000000
>
> #define X86_EFLAGS_CF 0x00000001
> #define X86_EFLAGS_FIXED 0x00000002
> @@ -157,6 +158,7 @@ static inline u8 cpuid_maxphyaddr(void)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPID (CPUID(0x7, 0, ECX, 22))
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL (CPUID(0x7, 0, EDX, 26))
> #define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES (CPUID(0x7, 0, EDX, 29))
> +#define X86_FEATURE_PKS (CPUID(0x7, 0, ECX, 31))
> #define X86_FEATURE_NX (CPUID(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 20))
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPRU (CPUID(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 4))
>
> diff --git a/x86/Makefile.x86_64 b/x86/Makefile.x86_64
> index af61d85..3a353df 100644
> --- a/x86/Makefile.x86_64
> +++ b/x86/Makefile.x86_64
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ tests += $(TEST_DIR)/tscdeadline_latency.flat
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/intel-iommu.flat
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/vmware_backdoors.flat
> tests += $(TEST_DIR)/rdpru.flat
> +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/pks.flat
>
> include $(SRCDIR)/$(TEST_DIR)/Makefile.common
>
> diff --git a/x86/pks.c b/x86/pks.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a3044cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/x86/pks.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
> +#include "libcflat.h"
> +#include "x86/desc.h"
> +#include "x86/processor.h"
> +#include "x86/vm.h"
> +#include "x86/msr.h"
> +
> +#define CR0_WP_MASK (1UL << 16)
> +#define PTE_PKEY_BIT 59
> +#define SUPER_BASE (1 << 24)
> +#define SUPER_VAR(v) (*((__typeof__(&(v))) (((unsigned long)&v) + SUPER_BASE)))
> +
> +volatile int pf_count = 0;
> +volatile unsigned save;
> +volatile unsigned test;
> +
> +static void set_cr0_wp(int wp)
> +{
> + unsigned long cr0 = read_cr0();
> +
> + cr0 &= ~CR0_WP_MASK;
> + if (wp)
> + cr0 |= CR0_WP_MASK;
> + write_cr0(cr0);
> +}
> +
> +void do_pf_tss(unsigned long error_code);
> +void do_pf_tss(unsigned long error_code)
> +{
> + printf("#PF handler, error code: 0x%lx\n", error_code);
> + pf_count++;
> + save = test;
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, 0);
> +}
> +
> +extern void pf_tss(void);
> +
> +asm ("pf_tss: \n\t"
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> + // no task on x86_64, save/restore caller-save regs
> + "push %rax; push %rcx; push %rdx; push %rsi; push %rdi\n"
> + "push %r8; push %r9; push %r10; push %r11\n"
> + "mov 9*8(%rsp), %rdi\n"
> +#endif
> + "call do_pf_tss \n\t"
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> + "pop %r11; pop %r10; pop %r9; pop %r8\n"
> + "pop %rdi; pop %rsi; pop %rdx; pop %rcx; pop %rax\n"
> +#endif
> + "add $"S", %"R "sp\n\t" // discard error code
> + "iret"W" \n\t"
> + "jmp pf_tss\n\t"
> + );
> +
> +static void init_test(void)
> +{
> + pf_count = 0;
> +
> + invlpg(&test);
> + invlpg(&SUPER_VAR(test));
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, 0);
> + set_cr0_wp(0);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int ac, char **av)
> +{
> + unsigned long i;
> + unsigned int pkey = 0x2;
> + unsigned int pkrs_ad = 0x10;
> + unsigned int pkrs_wd = 0x20;
> +
> + if (!this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PKS)) {
> + printf("PKS not enabled\n");
> + return report_summary();
> + }
> +
> + setup_vm();
> + setup_alt_stack();
> + set_intr_alt_stack(14, pf_tss);
> + wrmsr(MSR_EFER, rdmsr(MSR_EFER) | EFER_LMA);
> +
> + // First 16MB are user pages
> + for (i = 0; i < SUPER_BASE; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + *get_pte(phys_to_virt(read_cr3()), phys_to_virt(i)) |= ((unsigned long)pkey << PTE_PKEY_BIT);
> + invlpg((void *)i);
> + }
> +
> + // Present the same 16MB as supervisor pages in the 16MB-32MB range
> + for (i = SUPER_BASE; i < 2 * SUPER_BASE; i += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + *get_pte(phys_to_virt(read_cr3()), phys_to_virt(i)) &= ~SUPER_BASE;
> + *get_pte(phys_to_virt(read_cr3()), phys_to_virt(i)) &= ~PT_USER_MASK;
> + *get_pte(phys_to_virt(read_cr3()), phys_to_virt(i)) |= ((unsigned long)pkey << PTE_PKEY_BIT);
> + invlpg((void *)i);
> + }
> +
> + write_cr4(read_cr4() | X86_CR4_PKS);
> + write_cr3(read_cr3());
> +
> + init_test();
> + set_cr0_wp(1);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_ad);
> + SUPER_VAR(test) = 21;
> + report(pf_count == 1 && test == 21 && save == 0,
> + "write to supervisor page when pkrs is ad and wp == 1");
> +
> + init_test();
> + set_cr0_wp(0);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_ad);
> + SUPER_VAR(test) = 22;
> + report(pf_count == 1 && test == 22 && save == 21,
> + "write to supervisor page when pkrs is ad and wp == 0");
> +
> + init_test();
> + set_cr0_wp(1);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_wd);
> + SUPER_VAR(test) = 23;
> + report(pf_count == 1 && test == 23 && save == 22,
> + "write to supervisor page when pkrs is wd and wp == 1");
> +
> + init_test();
> + set_cr0_wp(0);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_wd);
> + SUPER_VAR(test) = 24;
> + report(pf_count == 0 && test == 24,
> + "write to supervisor page when pkrs is wd and wp == 0");
> +
> + init_test();
> + set_cr0_wp(0);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_wd);
> + test = 25;
> + report(pf_count == 0 && test == 25,
> + "write to user page when pkrs is wd and wp == 0");
> +
> + init_test();
> + set_cr0_wp(1);
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_wd);
> + test = 26;
> + report(pf_count == 0 && test == 26,
> + "write to user page when pkrs is wd and wp == 1");
> +
> + init_test();
> + wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PKRS, pkrs_ad);
> + (void)((__typeof__(&(test))) (((unsigned long)&test)));
> + report(pf_count == 0, "read from user page when pkrs is ad");
> +
> + return report_summary();
> +}
> diff --git a/x86/unittests.cfg b/x86/unittests.cfg
> index 3a79151..b75419e 100644
> --- a/x86/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/x86/unittests.cfg
> @@ -127,6 +127,11 @@ file = pku.flat
> arch = x86_64
> extra_params = -cpu host
>
> +[pks]
> +file = pks.flat
> +arch = x86_64
> +extra_params = -cpu host
> +
> [asyncpf]
> file = asyncpf.flat
> extra_params = -m 2048
>
Ping? ... Paolo, I think this one fell through the cracks?
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-18 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-05 8:17 [RFC v3 0/7] KVM: PKS Virtualization support Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:17 ` [RFC v3 1/7] KVM: VMX: Introduce PKS VMCS fields Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:17 ` [RFC v3 2/7] KVM: VMX: Expose IA32_PKRS MSR Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:18 ` [RFC v3 3/7] KVM: MMU: Rename the pkru to pkr Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:18 ` [RFC v3 4/7] KVM: MMU: Refactor pkr_mask to cache condition Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:18 ` [RFC v3 5/7] KVM: MMU: Add support for PKS emulation Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:18 ` [RFC v3 6/7] KVM: X86: Expose PKS to guest and userspace Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:18 ` [RFC v3 7/7] KVM: VMX: Enable PKS for nested VM Chenyi Qiang
2020-11-05 8:18 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Add tests for PKS Chenyi Qiang
2021-01-18 17:45 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-01-18 18:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-19 7:41 ` Chenyi Qiang
2021-01-27 9:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-14 2:11 [RFC v2 0/7] KVM: PKS Virtualization support Chenyi Qiang
2020-10-14 2:11 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] x86: Add tests for PKS Chenyi Qiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6174185b-25e0-f2a2-3f71-d8bbe6ca889d@redhat.com \
--to=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=chenyi.qiang@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®