From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756551AbdGXWVO (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:21:14 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:52796 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250AbdGXWUi (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2017 18:20:38 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , LKML , Doug Smythies Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Eliminate the PID controller Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:10:04 +0200 Message-ID: <6183701.sLtcQDF8CA@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.12.0-rc1+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, According to testing so far, the P-state selection based on the PID controller in intel_pstate can be replaced with the P-state selection based on CPU load with no considerable regressions *and* the PID-based P-state selection is generally flaky and hard to manage, make intel_pstate use the P-state selection based on CPU load for all categories of systems and eliminate the PID controller along with all things related to it from the driver. [1/2] is the actual elimination. [2/2] is a simplification possible after [1/2]. Thanks, Rafael