From: Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: vatsa@in.ibm.com, ck@vds.kolivas.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
johnstul@us.ibm.com,
linux-kernel Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, george@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [ck] [PATCH] dynamic-tick patch modified for SMP
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 00:15:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6189ECD1-1CE7-4E36-B9F4-FD4D9E5871FA@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200508141018.29668.kernel@kolivas.org>
On Aug 13, 2005, at 20:18:28, Con Kolivas wrote:
> It does seems there are some timing issues
> with this patch, although it is also quite stable (up for 10 hours
> now).
> I've had a few interesting messages in my syslog suggesting problems:
> Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
>
> and then later on a few of:
> set_rtc_mmss: can't update from 0 to 59
It may be a good idea to rebase this patch off the new generic time-
keeping
subsystem that John Stultz is working on. He's cleaned up much of
the code
relating to system time processing, which may make it easier to get it
right when skipping ticks (IE: You probably don't need to do anything
special to replay missed ticks, the new timer code automatically
handles it
for you). There is an excellent LWN article on his project here:
http://lwn.net/Articles/120850/
Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
--
Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible
-- Alan Kay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-14 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-12 20:19 Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-13 1:35 ` [ck] " Con Kolivas
2005-08-13 6:51 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-13 11:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-13 14:53 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-13 16:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-14 0:18 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-14 4:15 ` Kyle Moffett [this message]
2005-08-15 15:47 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-15 16:39 ` john stultz
2005-08-16 2:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-15 15:35 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-15 16:30 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-16 13:19 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-16 13:23 ` Con Kolivas
2005-08-17 7:53 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6189ECD1-1CE7-4E36-B9F4-FD4D9E5871FA@mac.com \
--to=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=tuukka.tikkanen@elektrobit.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®