From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65B4E75423 for ; Tue, 3 Oct 2023 04:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239126AbjJCE4Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2023 00:56:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43816 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229704AbjJCE4N (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2023 00:56:13 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12C8AA6 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 21:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-53fa455cd94so279632a12.2 for ; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 21:56:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igel-co-jp.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1696308967; x=1696913767; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ilTkBZZFi3vmBxJRkL+Dl4/IVPKPPr9aHRYw+yB6dQk=; b=gS2qR58E1rNoRspxH3DCG81ntoeLCvQT1Bvj6O3ZK5H5K5tFVkyBm7tE/VgfHqt7S1 41gqW9V460btjZVheUx6N7n8LjF2aWjL4mHEk+nRVG4zKe8+UXW3mP6V9SHFE+FVkmEF vqXPjxlUY/gNnzLWO8PkMUkTJJL1LoQBwVD+S3fnkw3omtAKVaKW5LFKz92eTjTCaNi2 wM0eCZwoSWJdAGE/4F7WoM+ZBGAJMBcoW8kKebmXajAMx5QaYB2yi5MJ9zWG3gWqtMd7 U62s57mOG/P0ltxn9GgDuMqFyiMvCe878RsitZ6EZJFWlGdtoJdI8TLKCy6B/afWMigG dglg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696308967; x=1696913767; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ilTkBZZFi3vmBxJRkL+Dl4/IVPKPPr9aHRYw+yB6dQk=; b=oG5TDh6dQ4r7/8H3P0lF6UOqCbq/C/oAAQTaosmwPe2sZe3H4R/lV/3dpFfWKENYlW hxl20Jn4apelfJx4T9R5fJ9UqFRAwCL4g2aZ06+zPuY30ivjcaQuPZzTz8ZgPKfRM0QG 8iqXi6/N8hLLCFn5tIzGsh7kKh4hizZTBjN4rzYo5P+u/1HgvfRBDunM91mErFayvvBc 58AzD7x4kP+rbbJ9PCaiNBzye1ov/SbWnYbinLq3gMFhlzYMg4Gw/DzuUvE1EZg3IcSq cUtsWt3etOKxQbDWNlw95CrqrmqoXyFWoTY9zNpvoMHfx2TlrB5Ryy4GnyNmpJrPJhIU q7Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyEX1JZ550zYR1g1ZsVYC5zJZ06YVikF/0s35U/guanUwLruNZI kjl87HVw42G59lZflac9rUnyrg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6NCGNlIKP+rW1/FCMU9Rq5G8uJz4TIGGSpaElLBI7UzyCuW43dLZzcPo2KaHCpJB1fBKpxA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:3d87:b0:13f:b028:789c with SMTP id s7-20020a056a203d8700b0013fb028789cmr12882806pzi.5.1696308967409; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 21:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.16.161.199] (napt.igel.co.jp. [219.106.231.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s8-20020a170902ea0800b001c631236505sm365110plg.228.2023.10.02.21.56.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 21:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <61d82a6b-ab8a-06cc-9514-0baac736f92f@igel.co.jp> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 13:56:03 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal of QEMU PCI Endpoint test environment Content-Language: en-US To: Vaishnav Achath , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marcel Apfelbaum , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Rob Herring , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=c5=84ski?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Kishon Vijay Abraham I References: <1269bf62-d67f-9f61-0139-dc20d23a9b5e@ti.com> From: Shunsuke Mie In-Reply-To: <1269bf62-d67f-9f61-0139-dc20d23a9b5e@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Vaishnav, On 2023/09/26 21:40, Vaishnav Achath wrote: > Hi Kishon, all, > > On 26/09/23 15:17, Shunsuke Mie wrote: >> On 2023/09/21 18:11, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> +Vaishnav >>> >>> Hi Shunsuke, >>> >>> On 8/18/2023 7:16 PM, Shunsuke Mie wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> We are proposing to add a new test syste to Linux for PCIe Endpoint. That >>>> can be run on QEMU without real hardware. At present, partially we have >>>> confirmed that pci-epf-test is working, but it is not yet complete. >>>> However, we would appreciate your comments on the architecture design. >>>> >>>> # Background >>>> The background is as follows. >>>> >>>> PCI Endpoint function driver is implemented using the PCIe Endpoint >>>> framework, but it requires physical boards for testing, and it is difficult >>>> to test sufficiently. In order to find bugs and hardware-dependent >>>> implementations early, continuous testing is required. Since it is >>>> difficult to automate tests that require hardware, this RFC proposes a >>>> virtual environment for testing PCI endpoint function drivers. >>> This would be quite useful and thank you for attempting it! I would like to >>> compare other mechanisms available in-addition to QEMU before going with the >>> QEMU approach. >> I got it. I'll make a table to compare some methods that includes greybus to >> realize this emulation environment. >> >> >> Best, >> >> Shunsuke >> >>> Though I don't understand this fully, Looking at >>> https://osseu2023.sched.com/event/1OGk8/emulating-devices-in-linux-using-greybus-subsystem-vaishnav-mohandas-achath-texas-instruments, Vaishnav seems to solve the same problem using greybus for multiple type s of devices. >>> >>> Vaishnav, we'd wait for your OSS presentation but do you have any initial >>> thoughts on how greybus could be used to test PCIe endpoint drivers? >>> > Apologies for the delay, I don't think greybus can be used for PCIe testing as > there is no greybus equivalent for PCIe[1], it can only be used for relatively > simpler devices today, I guess roadtest(UML based)[2] could be an alternative in > this case. Thank you for your comment. To my understanding, the roadtest uses UML and it interact with hardware model written in python to do testing. This would be grate for automated testing to test drivers and subsystems. For this PCIe endpoint, I think we need to hosts, one that works as a PCIe endpoint and one that is a PCIe Root Complex to it. Is it possible to realize the system? like: UML + PCIe endpoint function driver <-> python HW model (PCI Endpoint controller) <-> UML + pci driver for the function As another option, I'm considering the feasibility of dummy PCIe EPC driver. It works as a PCIe EPC device in kernel and show pci device according to the PCIe endpoint function driver to the same host. so It could be realize a single host and test the function driver. Best, Shunsuke > 1 - > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/staging/greybus > 2 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YjN1ksNGujV611Ka@sirena.org.uk/ > > Thanks and Regards, > Vaishnav > >>> Thanks, >>> Kishon >>> >>>> # Architecture >>>> The overview of the architecture is as follows. >>>> >>>>    Guest 1                        Guest 2 >>>> +-------------------------+    +----------------------------+ >>>> | Linux kernel            |    | Linux kernel               | >>>> |                         |    |                            | >>>> | PCI EP function driver  |    |                            | >>>> | (e.g. pci-epf-test)     |    |                            | >>>> |-------------------------|    | PCI Device Driver          | >>>> | (2) QEMU EPC Driver     |    | (e.g. pci_endpoint_test)   | >>>> +-------------------------+    +----------------------------+ >>>> +-------------------------+    +----------------------------+ >>>> | QEMU                    |    | QEMU                       | >>>> |-------------------------|    |----------------------------| >>>> | (1) QEMU PCI EPC Device *----* (3) QEMU EPF Bridge Device | >>>> +-------------------------+    +----------------------------+ >>>> >>>> At present, it is designed to work guests only on the same host, and >>>> communication is done through Unix domain sockets. >>>> >>>> The three parts shown in the figure were introduced this time. >>>> >>>> (1) QEMU PCI Endpoint Controller(EPC) Device >>>> PCI Endpoint Controller implemented as QEMU PCI device. >>>> (2) QEMU PCI Endpoint Controller(EPC) Driver >>>> Linux kernel driver that drives the device (1). It registers a epc device >>>> to linux kernel and handling each operations for the epc device. >>>> (3) QEMU PCI Endpoint function(EPF) Bridge Device >>>> QEMU PCI device that cooperates with (1) and performs accesses to pci >>>> configuration space, BAR and memory space to communicate each guests, and >>>> generates interruptions to the guest 1. >>>> >>>> Each projects are: >>>> (1), (3) https://github.com/ShunsukeMie/qemu/tree/epf-bridge/v1 >>>> >>>> files: hw/misc/{qemu-epc.{c,h}, epf-bridge.c} >>>> (2) https://github.com/ShunsukeMie/linux-virtio-rdma/tree/qemu-epc >>>> >>>> files: drivers/pci/controller/pcie-qemu-ep.c >>>> >>>> # Protocol >>>> >>>> PCI, PCIe has a layer structure that includes Physical, Data Lane and >>>> Transaction. The communicates between the bridge(3) and controller (1) >>>> mimic the Transaction. Specifically, a protocol is implemented for >>>> exchanging fd for communication protocol version check and communication, >>>> in addition to the interaction equivalent to PCIe Transaction Layer Packet >>>> (Read and Write of I/O, Memory, Configuration space and Message). In my >>>> mind, we need to discuss the communication mor. >>>> >>>> We also are planning to post the patch set after the code is organized and >>>> the protocol discussion is matured. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Shunsuke