From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT_JIFFIES
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 16:08:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61e43dcb781c9e880fac95b525830fd384de122a.camel@dubeyko.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdV5VtR+vgYKcZtvcz16GPp9YLG_ecAeDsiNCreP4rYKjw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Thu, 2019-12-26 at 11:43 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Vyacheslav,
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2019 at 10:58 AM Vyacheslav Dubeyko <
> slava@dubeyko.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-12-23 at 09:41 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 5:01 AM Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > As Geert Uytterhoeven reported:
> > > >
> > > > for parameter HZ/50 in congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
> > > >
> > > > On some platforms, HZ can be less than 50, then unexpected 0
> > > > timeout
> > > > jiffies will be set in congestion_wait().
> >
> > It looks like that HZ could have various value on diferent
> > platforms.
> > So, why does it need to divide HZ on 50? Does it really necessary?
> > Could it be used HZ only without the division operation?
>
> A timeout of HZ means 1 second.
> HZ/50 means 20 ms, but has the risk of being zero, if HZ < 50.
>
> If you want to use a timeout of 20 ms, you best use
> msecs_to_jiffies(20),
> as that takes care of the special cases, and never returns 0.
>
The msecs_to_jiffies(20) looks much better for my taste. Maybe, we
could use this as solution of the issue?
Thanks,
Viacheslav Dubeyko.
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-26 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-23 4:00 Chao Yu
2019-12-23 8:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-25 9:58 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko
2019-12-26 9:38 ` Chao Yu
2019-12-26 10:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-26 13:08 ` Vyacheslav Dubeyko [this message]
2019-12-26 13:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-12-26 3:42 ` Chao Yu
2019-12-31 12:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61e43dcb781c9e880fac95b525830fd384de122a.camel@dubeyko.com \
--to=slava@dubeyko.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®