From: liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
Cc: <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: fix live migration enable conditions for PF passthrough
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 16:39:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61ffbd35-e8f8-1131-ce3d-96598d684ad3@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917211052.5166a8c7@shazbot.org>
On 2026/9/18 11:10, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:13:31 +0800
> liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2026/9/12 1:37, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 17:09:49 +0800
>>> Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When a PF device is bound to the live migration driver in passthrough mode,
>>>> it cannot support live migration functionality, and key pointers will
>>>> remain uninitialized. Although most migration functions within the driver
>>>> are unreachable, low-level error handling callbacks may be triggered
>>>> directly, causing a crash due to null pointer dereference.
>>>> The fix involves adding validity checks at three entry points: device
>>>> probe, error handling, and migration initialization. If the pointer is
>>>> invalid, the operation is exited or rejected directly to avoid crashes,
>>>> while redundant internal checks are removed.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: b0eed085903e ("hisi_acc_vfio_pci: Add support for VFIO live migration")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c | 24 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>>>> index 86362ec424a5..e95d0ab0f11a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/hisilicon/hisi_acc_vfio_pci.c
>>>> @@ -1154,9 +1154,14 @@ static void hisi_acc_vf_pci_reset_prepare(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev = hisi_acc_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> struct hisi_qm *qm = hisi_acc_vdev->pf_qm;
>>>> - struct device *dev = &qm->pdev->dev;
>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> u32 delay = 0;
>>>>
>>>> + if (!qm || !qm->io_base) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "PF QM not available for reset\n");
>>>> + return;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> /* All reset requests need to be queued for processing */
>>>> while (test_and_set_bit(QM_RESETTING, &qm->misc_ctl)) {
>>>> msleep(1);
>>>> @@ -1174,8 +1179,12 @@ static void hisi_acc_vf_pci_aer_reset_done(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev = hisi_acc_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> struct hisi_qm *qm = hisi_acc_vdev->pf_qm;
>>>>
>>>> - if (hisi_acc_vdev->set_reset_flag)
>>>> - clear_bit(QM_RESETTING, &qm->misc_ctl);
>>>> + if (hisi_acc_vdev->set_reset_flag) {
>>>> + if (qm && qm->io_base)
>>>> + clear_bit(QM_RESETTING, &qm->misc_ctl);
>>>> + else
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "PF QM not available for reset done\n");
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> set_reset_flag is only set by reset_prepare, which per the previous
>>> chunk can only occur if qm && qm->io_base, so this chunk is redundant.
>>> Why not just promote the mig_ops tests in both?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> if (!hisi_acc_vdev->core_device.vdev.mig_ops)
>>>> return;
>>>> @@ -1565,6 +1574,11 @@ static int hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_init_dev(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
>>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(core_vdev->dev);
>>>> struct hisi_qm *pf_qm = hisi_acc_get_pf_qm(pdev);
>>>>
>>>> + if (!pf_qm) {
>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "PF driver not loaded, cannot enable migration\n");
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> This function is only reached via hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_ops, which is
>>> already validated in probe to have a pf_qm with version >= QM_HW_V3.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> hisi_acc_vdev->vf_id = pci_iov_vf_id(pdev) + 1;
>>>> hisi_acc_vdev->pf_qm = pf_qm;
>>>> hisi_acc_vdev->vf_dev = pdev;
>>>> @@ -1670,13 +1684,11 @@ static int hisi_acc_vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device
>>>> struct hisi_acc_vf_core_device *hisi_acc_vdev;
>>>> const struct vfio_device_ops *ops = &hisi_acc_vfio_pci_ops;
>>>> struct hisi_qm *pf_qm;
>>>> - int vf_id;
>>>> int ret;
>>>>
>>>> pf_qm = hisi_acc_get_pf_qm(pdev);
>>>> if (pf_qm && pf_qm->ver >= QM_HW_V3) {
>>>> - vf_id = pci_iov_vf_id(pdev);
>>>> - if (vf_id >= 0)
>>>> + if (pdev->is_virtfn)
>>>> ops = &hisi_acc_vfio_pci_migrn_ops;
>>>> else
>>>> pci_warn(pdev, "migration support failed, continue with generic interface\n");
>>>
>>> This is not reachable as a VF:
>>>
>>> static struct hisi_qm *hisi_acc_get_pf_qm(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> {
>>> struct hisi_qm *pf_qm;
>>> struct pci_driver *pf_driver;
>>>
>>> if (!pdev->is_virtfn)
>>> return NULL;
>>>
>>>
>>> pf_qm is NULL, the branch is never taken for a PF. Also:
>>>
>>> int pci_iov_vf_id(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *pf;
>>>
>>> if (!dev->is_virtfn)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> So even the redundant test is already here. What are you trying to
>>> accomplish in this chunk? Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for the review. Regarding the first two checks in `aer_reset_done` and `migrn_init_dev`,
>> you are correct that they are redundant; we will remove them in the next revision.
>>
>> However, the PF passthrough scenario still crashes. The calltrace we actually tested occurs on
>> the following path:
>
> I didn't argue this fact, I only noted the .reset_done fix is redundant
> and suggested a better ordering.
>
Yes, in the reset_done function, the existing mig_ops check can intercept abnormal PF devices.
>>
>> hisi_acc_vfio_pci_open_device
>> → vfio_pci_core_enable
>> → pci_try_reset_function
>> → hisi_acc_vf_pci_reset_prepare ← NULL pointer dereference
>>
>>
>> `reset_prepare` is a PCI error handler callback invoked by `pci_try_reset_function` inside
>> `vfio_pci_core_enable`, which happens before the `mig_ops` check in `open_device`.
>> At this point, the PF's `pf_qm` is NULL, and `reset_prepare` dereferences `&qm->pdev->dev`,
>> causing an oops:
>>
>>
>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000010
>> pc : hisi_acc_vf_pci_reset_prepare+0x34/0xc0
>> Call trace:
>> hisi_acc_vf_pci_reset_prepare
>> pci_dev_save_and_disable
>> pci_try_reset_function
>> vfio_pci_core_enable
>> hisi_acc_vfio_pci_open_device
>> vfio_df_open
>>
>>
>> This shows that the `vf_id`-based check in `probe` does not actually prevent the PF
>> from reaching `reset_prepare`;
>> the PF still triggers the calltrace through this path. The fix here will follow your
>> suggestion: elevate the `mig_ops` check at the entry of `reset_prepare`, and also
>> move the existing `mig_ops` check in `aer_reset_done` ahead of the `set_reset_flag`
>> handling.
>> The `is_virtfn` check in `probe` will be retained to maintain consistent semantics with
>> other vendor drivers.
>
> I don't see this provides any consistency with other drivers, only the
> virtio driver has a is_virtfn test and it is the fundamental test that
> driver uses to select the migration ops. It's not comparable to this
> use case. Thanks,
>
After intercepting live migration support for 64K page systems in probe, using the
`is_virtfn` check allows us to eliminate some redundant code and simplify the handling.
I've posted the new revision; please take a look.
Thanks.
Longfang.
> Alex
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 9:09 [PATCH v3 0/3] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: fix three driver issues Longfang Liu
2026-08-31 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: fix live migration enable conditions for PF passthrough Longfang Liu
2026-09-11 17:37 ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-17 6:13 ` liulongfang
2026-09-18 3:10 ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-18 8:39 ` liulongfang [this message]
2026-08-31 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: clear set_reset_flag after reset completed Longfang Liu
2026-08-31 9:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] hisi_acc_vfio_pci: reject live migration on 64KB page with QM_HW_V3 hardware Longfang Liu
2026-09-11 17:37 ` Alex Williamson
2026-09-17 6:13 ` liulongfang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61ffbd35-e8f8-1131-ce3d-96598d684ad3@huawei.com \
--to=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®