From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
To: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, asml.silence@gmail.com,
willemb@google.com, almasrymina@google.com, chopps@labn.net,
aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, dust.li@linux.alibaba.com,
hustcat@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipvs: Always clear ipvs_property flag in skb_scrub_packet()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 11:13:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6202010a-412f-4d63-92a5-d78ba216c65e@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250221013648.35716-1-lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
Le 21/02/2025 à 02:36, Philo Lu a écrit :
> We found an issue when using bpf_redirect with ipvs NAT mode after
> commit ff70202b2d1a ("dev_forward_skb: do not scrub skb mark within
> the same name space"). Particularly, we use bpf_redirect to return
> the skb directly back to the netif it comes from, i.e., xnet is
> false in skb_scrub_packet(), and then ipvs_property is preserved
> and SNAT is skipped in the rx path.
>
> ipvs_property has been already cleared when netns is changed in
> commit 2b5ec1a5f973 ("netfilter/ipvs: clear ipvs_property flag when
> SKB net namespace changed"). This patch just clears it in spite of
> netns.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philo Lu <lulie@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> This is in fact a fix patch, and the issue was found after commit
> ff70202b2d1a ("dev_forward_skb: do not scrub skb mark within
> the same name space"). But I'm not sure if a "Fixes" tag should be
> added to that commit.
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 7b03b64fdcb2..b1c81687e9d8 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -6033,11 +6033,11 @@ void skb_scrub_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, bool xnet)
> skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0;
> skb->offload_l3_fwd_mark = 0;
> #endif
> + ipvs_reset(skb);
>
> if (!xnet)
> return;
>
> - ipvs_reset(skb);
I don't know IPVS, but I wonder if this patch will not introduce a regression
for other users. skb_scrub_packet() is used by a lot of tunnels, it's not
specific to bpf_redirect().
Regards,
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-21 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 1:36 Philo Lu
2025-02-21 10:13 ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2025-02-21 15:59 ` Julian Anastasov
2025-02-21 11:42 ` Julian Anastasov
2025-02-21 11:55 ` Philo Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6202010a-412f-4d63-92a5-d78ba216c65e@6wind.com \
--to=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=almasrymina@google.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chopps@labn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=hustcat@gmail.com \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®