mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Suman Ghosh <sumang@marvell.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@marvell.com>,
	Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Linu Cherian <lcherian@marvell.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@marvell.com>,
	Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: octeontx2-af: Fix klockwork issues in AF driver
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:48:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6217cc19-9aa4-48e2-85ef-2bbe4c0d8189@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR18MB521611653D45DEDFC42704D9DBCB2@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

> I guess that there is a need to split different change possibilities
> into separate update steps.
> This is the first time I have submitted for klockwork fixes.
>
> Since these are similar klockwork fixes based on variable declaration and NULL checks.

Did this source code analysis tool present items according to different
development concerns (from selected categories)?


> I thought of combining the same.

Would you like to take the known advice “Solve only one problem per patch”
better into account?
Please take another look at further approaches for the presentation of
similar “change combinations”.


> Do you suggest 2 separate patch one for variable declaration and one for NULL checks?

Probably, yes.


> Or do I need to submit patch per file?

Maybe.

You can dare to offer software updates for each concern category
as patch series.
You can adapt then also better for constraints according to the selection of tags
(like “Fixes” and “Cc”), can't you?

Regards,
Markus

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-23  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-22  6:17 [net PATCH] " Suman Ghosh
2024-06-22 18:17 ` Markus Elfring
     [not found]   ` <SJ0PR18MB521611653D45DEDFC42704D9DBCB2@SJ0PR18MB5216.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
2024-06-23  6:48     ` Markus Elfring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6217cc19-9aa4-48e2-85ef-2bbe4c0d8189@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gakula@marvell.com \
    --cc=hkelam@marvell.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sbhatta@marvell.com \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    --cc=sumang@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®