From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758311AbYC0Myf (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:54:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756186AbYC0My0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:54:26 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.187]:4940 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756000AbYC0MyZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Mar 2008 08:54:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=ujpHh70jagGdDjxq/oyRYKjwj3UL8Kg5EK1EZ3NgXkgJnKdtivUkMpYEj7WlCbqiBmXcQ+GAogiBvV346NS2k781MiH5zyFrVcoa3t6pJHCOwthsx39w4An/0Su/4QEw69B2HdXTSV849VFOAPfBFureTpZvkbJjnQ9NnQb/4Ew= Message-ID: <621d098f0803270554j287ce58eme4b0e52cb6470154@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 13:54:23 +0100 From: "Jan Dittmer" To: "Adrian Bunk" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 Cc: "Haavard Skinnemoen" , "Stephen Rothwell" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML In-Reply-To: <20080327115459.GB1686@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080327183357.7c637aed.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080327104224.2b98b561@hskinnemo-gx620.norway.atmel.com> <20080327104745.GA1686@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <20080327123226.452f0a3f@hskinnemo-gx620.norway.atmel.com> <20080327115459.GB1686@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2a2df0fd3b7584b4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:32:26PM +0100, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:47:45 +0200 > > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > According to Jan's page, there's still a build error with the defconfig: > > > http://l4x.org/k/?d=40450#err > > > > Hmm...that must be a pretty ancient toolchain. That's the toolchain from back when avr32 was first integrated in the kernel. So it may be outdated, but I didn't read any statement on the contrary. I tend to keep the toolchains stable as long as possible. > > FWIW, a more recent toolchain is available here: > > > > http://avr32linux.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/BinutilsPatches > > http://avr32linux.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GccPatches So how can I get notified if I need a more recent toolchain? IMHO every architecture should have a file somewhere (in the kernel tree) where the required toolchain versions are listed and required patches are linked. That would make it such discussions unnecessary. Jan -- Jan Dittmer