mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, changlianzhi@uniontech.com,
	dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: vt: add a bounds checking in vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl()
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 10:10:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6236da54-c651-9dc7-f5ce-824be96b3e9d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220908075403.27930-1-hbh25y@gmail.com>

On 08. 09. 22, 9:54, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> As array_index_nospec's comments indicate,a bounds checking need to add
> before calling array_index_nospec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> index be8313cdbac3..b9845455df79 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> @@ -2067,6 +2067,9 @@ int vt_do_kdgkb_ioctl(int cmd, struct kbsentry __user *user_kdgkb, int perm)
>   	if (get_user(kb_func, &user_kdgkb->kb_func))
>   		return -EFAULT;
>   
> +	if (kb_func >= MAX_NR_FUNC)

kb_func is unsigned char and MAX_NR_FUNC is 256. So this should be 
eliminated by the compiler anyway.

But the check might be a good idea if we ever decide to support more 
keys. But will/can we? I am not so sure, so adding it right now is kind 
of superfluous. In any way we'd need to introduce a completely different 
iterface/ioctls.

> +		return -EFAULT;

EINVAL would be more appropriate, IMO.

> +
>   	kb_func = array_index_nospec(kb_func, MAX_NR_FUNC);
>   
>   	switch (cmd) {

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-08  8:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-08  7:54 Hangyu Hua
2022-09-08  8:10 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2022-09-09  2:02   ` Hangyu Hua
2022-09-08  8:16 ` Greg KH
2022-09-08 13:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-09-12 11:18 ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6236da54-c651-9dc7-f5ce-824be96b3e9d@kernel.org \
    --to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=changlianzhi@uniontech.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hbh25y@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®