From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/debug: Use sched_debug_lock to serialize use of cgroup_path[] only
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:43:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <626d056e-1489-d406-62cc-4b981ff94175@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330104235.afoljxizvfcijxqx@maple.lan>
On 3/30/21 6:42 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 03:32:35PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> The handling of sysrq keys should normally be done in an user context
>> except when MAGIC_SYSRQ_SERIAL is set and the magic sequence is typed
>> in a serial console.
> This seems to be a poor summary of the typical calling context for
> handle_sysrq() except in the trivial case of using
> /proc/sysrq-trigger.
>
> For example on my system then the backtrace when I do sysrq-h on a USB
> keyboard shows us running from a softirq handler and with interrupts
> locked. Note also that the interrupt lock is present even on systems that
> handle keyboard input from a kthread due to the interrupt lock in
> report_input_key().
I will reword this part of the patch. I don't have a deep understanding
of how the different way of keyword input work and thanks for showing me
that there are other ways of getting keyboard input.
>
>> Currently in print_cpu() of kernel/sched/debug.c, sched_debug_lock is taken
>> with interrupt disabled for the whole duration of the calls to print_*_stats()
>> and print_rq() which could last for the quite some time if the information dump
>> happens on the serial console.
>>
>> If the system has many cpus and the sched_debug_lock is somehow busy
>> (e.g. parallel sysrq-t), the system may hit a hard lockup panic, like
> <snip>
>
>> The purpose of sched_debug_lock is to serialize the use of the global
>> cgroup_path[] buffer in print_cpu(). The rests of the printk() calls
>> don't need serialization from sched_debug_lock.
>>
>> Calling printk() with interrupt disabled can still be/proc/sysrq-trigger
>> problematic. Allocating a stack buffer of PATH_MAX bytes is not
>> feasible. So a compromised solution is used where a small stack buffer
>> is allocated for pathname. If the actual pathname is short enough, it
>> is copied to the stack buffer with sched_debug_lock release afterward
>> before printk(). Otherwise, the global group_path[] buffer will be
>> used with sched_debug_lock held until after printk().
> Does this actually fix the problem in any circumstance except when the
> sysrq is triggered using /proc/sysrq-trigger?
I have a reproducer that generates hard lockup panic when there are
multiple instances of sysrq-t via /proc/sysrq-trigger. This is probably
less a problem on console as I don't think we can do multiple
simultaneous sysrq-t there. Anyway, my goal is to limit the amount of
time that irq is disabled. Doing a printk can take a while depending on
whether there are contention in the underlying locks or resources. Even
if I limit the the critical sections to just those printk() that outputs
cgroup path, I can still cause the panic.
Cheers,
Longman
The approach used by this patch should minimize the chance of a panic
happening. However, if there are many tasks with very long cgroup paths,
I suppose that panic may still happen under some extreme conditions. So
I won't say this will completely fix the problem until the printk()
rework that makes printk work more like printk_deferred() is merged.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-30 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-29 19:32 Waiman Long
2021-03-30 10:42 ` Daniel Thompson
2021-03-30 17:43 ` Waiman Long [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=626d056e-1489-d406-62cc-4b981ff94175@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®