From: "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
To: zhfeng.osprey@gmail.com
Cc: "Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to optimize system time for such case?
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 09:27:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6278d2220611020127j62f94ccat5a158059feab37cb@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3c691930611020116n6ee14112lff7632be72e7df71@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/11/06, miles <zhfeng.osprey@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/2/06, Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FENG ZHOU wrote:
> > > Hello, all
> > > I am optimizing a compiler and I believe there is a bug in such
> > > compile. Currently, I have a test case, which is a scientific
> > > application, has a lot of system time. This is weird, because this
> > > case does not have many system calls. Meanwhile, compiled at another
> > > option, I found all the "system time" are gone! So, I assume there is
> > > some problem in the first one (though both binary produce correct
> > > result). I used some performance tuning tool and found the hottest
> > > address for CPU privilege level change event is: 0xa000000100001a70.
> > > This address is not in code or data segment. Now, I am kinda stuck
> > > here. My question is: how to find what this address is? Or find out
> > > what is the cause of the "system time"? Thanks in advance.
> > >
> > > PS: the platform is Itanium 2.
> > > -Feng
> >
> > First question is what kernel, second is how much memory?
> >
> > I recently had this experience (high system time) with some vendor
> > kernels with a system with 16GB of memory and 4-8GB processes. The VM
> > was trying to reclaim pages like crazy, but failing.
>
> The system is a debian3.1 with 2.6.8 #1 SMP kernel. The total memory is 4GB.
> Total number of processes is about 100. It is a SPEC CPU program.
I'd say it's worth a shot with a more modern kernel. There are
probably related bugs in that kernel. The one I had (related, but not
directly) problems with was 2.6.9 + vendor patches.
--
Daniel J Blueman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-02 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-02 9:10 Daniel J Blueman
[not found] ` <b3c691930611020116n6ee14112lff7632be72e7df71@mail.gmail.com>
2006-11-02 9:27 ` Daniel J Blueman [this message]
[not found] <b3c691930611020047p4a59206aj3fc3060e2f74e426@mail.gmail.com>
2006-11-02 8:52 ` FENG ZHOU
2006-11-02 12:34 ` Livio Soares
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6278d2220611020127j62f94ccat5a158059feab37cb@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhfeng.osprey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®