mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
To: nramaswamy@openai.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>,
	Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] tcp: restore RACK list membership when undoing loss
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 08:42:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <627cd81c-9824-4d1b-ae47-f7f929a96596@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f366f5325d7eb96f0edd999b4f984213743914b8.1791248202.git.nramaswamy@openai.com>



On 10/6/26 07:15, nramaswamy@openai.com wrote:
> From: Neil Ramaswamy <nramaswamy@openai.com>
> 
> Partial undo can clear the TCPCB_LOST flag on segments already removed
> from RACK's list, which prevents subsequent RACK loss detection, leading
> to segments only being retransmitted after the RTO. Restoring them to
> the RACK list as part of partial undo makes sure we can properly
> reconsider them for fast retransmission in the future.
> 
> To do this, we first sort (by transmission time) the segments whose
> TCPCB_LOST flag is being cleared and then linearly insert those back
> into the RACK list, which is sorted by transmission time.
> 
> My investigation started from seeing repeated TCP stalls in prod and the
> mitigation that seemed to prevent these stalls was limiting SO_SNDBUF to
> 96 KiB. It also seems like others have seen similar symptoms before [1].
> 
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/35A4DDAA-7E8D-43CB-A1F5-D1E46A4ED42E@gmail.com/
> 
> Fixes: 043b87d7599e ("tcp: more efficient RACK loss detection")
> Signed-off-by: Neil Ramaswamy <nramaswamy@openai.com>
> Assisted-by: LLM sparse
> ---
>   net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 92bc60716f33..51f04c7474dc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
>   #include <linux/module.h>
>   #include <linux/sysctl.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/list_sort.h>
>   #include <linux/prefetch.h>
>   #include <linux/bitops.h>
>   #include <net/dst.h>
> @@ -2840,16 +2841,50 @@ static void DBGUNDO(struct sock *sk, const char *msg)
>   #endif
>   }
>   
> +static int tcp_rack_skb_cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a,
> +			    const struct list_head *b)
> +{
> +	const struct sk_buff *skb_a = list_entry(a, struct sk_buff,
> +					       tcp_tsorted_anchor);
> +	const struct sk_buff *skb_b = list_entry(b, struct sk_buff,
> +					       tcp_tsorted_anchor);
> +
> +	return tcp_skb_sent_after(tcp_skb_timestamp_us(skb_a),
> +				  tcp_skb_timestamp_us(skb_b),
> +				  TCP_SKB_CB(skb_a)->end_seq,
> +				  TCP_SKB_CB(skb_b)->end_seq);

Patch LGTM, but perhaps we could avoid the two div_u64() calls here.


	return tcp_skb_sent_after(skb_a->skb_mstamp_ns,
				  skb_b->skb_mstamp_ns,
				  TCP_SKB_CB(skb_a)->end_seq,
				  TCP_SKB_CB(skb_b)->end_seq);



> +}
> +
>   static void tcp_undo_cwnd_reduction(struct sock *sk, bool unmark_loss)
>   {
>   	struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
>   
>   	if (unmark_loss) {
> +		LIST_HEAD(restored);
>   		struct sk_buff *skb;
>   
>   		skb_rbtree_walk(skb, &sk->tcp_rtx_queue) {
> +			if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_LOST)
> +				list_move_tail(&skb->tcp_tsorted_anchor,
> +					       &restored);
>   			TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked &= ~TCPCB_LOST;
>   		}
> +		if (!list_empty(&restored)) {
> +			struct list_head *pos = &tp->tsorted_sent_queue;
> +
> +			/* Ensure lost skbs are added in transmission order */
> +			list_sort(NULL, &restored, tcp_rack_skb_cmp);
> +			while (!list_empty(&restored)) {
> +				struct list_head *entry = restored.next;
> +
> +				while (pos->next != &tp->tsorted_sent_queue &&
> +				       !tcp_rack_skb_cmp(NULL, pos->next,
> +						 entry))
> +					pos = pos->next;
> +				list_move(entry, pos);
> +				pos = entry;
> +			}
> +		}
>   		tp->lost_out = 0;
>   		tcp_clear_all_retrans_hints(tp);
>   	}


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06  5:15 [PATCH net v2 0/2] tcp: preserve RACK tracking across partial undo nramaswamy
2026-10-06  5:15 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] tcp: restore RACK list membership when undoing loss nramaswamy
2026-10-06  6:42   ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2026-10-06  5:15 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: net: packetdrill: test RACK after partial undo nramaswamy
2026-10-06  7:04   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=627cd81c-9824-4d1b-ae47-f7f929a96596@kernel.org \
    --to=edumazet@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramaswamy@openai.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®