From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754398Ab0CWDsK (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:48:10 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.211.172]:65197 "EHLO mail-yw0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754246Ab0CWDsI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:48:08 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NMZn0Y34QK+cECdCP+WF8KgUnyLeMvWTbLmQb7/M3PWLhHEmOXAt3Wu+PP4n2Iao8Q 4VGMkJd4SWy6UKjDZOPiGEVCdiX2Y+muWFqf2P+TlXm3/M3ZFJfLWif6udCgFM83cujh OTDlZZXH5sqd1iI2kste+qbLnsMvXSAWB9DKY= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20100320143240.GB2942@localhost.localdomain> <4BA7A3CF.8070503@trash.net> <628d1651003221834g543e3e6cl4ea39c0886cb4ba1@mail.gmail.com> <7b6bb4a51003221929i16673523nd5f558ccbaace397@mail.gmail.com> <628d1651003221937q58ff39fel467636ab55531128@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:48:06 +0800 Message-ID: <628d1651003222048k1eaf6929r81fd06e401190e0@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c From: wzt wzt To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Xiaotian Feng , Patrick McHardy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 1、 suppose *len = 35, sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) = 36 2、 set get.size = 0xffffffff from user space 3、 sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size = 36 + 0xffffffff = 35; 4、 if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size) was bypassed. you can test with c code: #include int main(void) { unsigned int arg = 0xffffffff; printf("%u\n", arg + 36); if (35 != arg + 36) { printf("not over flow.\n"); return -1; } printf("arg over flow.\n"); return 0; } On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Tuesday 2010-03-23 03:37, wzt wzt wrote: >>> And, for the addition overflow, can it be caught by >>> >>> "if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size)"  ??? >> >>sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size can be overflow as *len, >>get.size is control by user space with copy_from_user(). > > The != should catch it. > > For 64-bit environments: > * + invoked with size_t, unsigned int >  => right side promoted to size_t, result type is size_t > * != invoked with int and size_t >  => left-side promoted to ssize_t (probably; but something as large as size_t) > * get.size is 32-bit bounded, as is *len, >  so no overflow to worry about at all unless you make >  sizeof(X) hilariously big close to 2^64 which is rather unlikely. > > For 32-bit environments: > * Let *len be a number of choice (e.g. 36) > * Find a sizeof(X)+get.size that equals 36 mod 2^32. > * Since sizeof(X) is const, get.size must be 0 mod 2^32. > * So get.size must be a multiple of 2^32 to fool the system. > * Since get.size itself is only a 32-bit quantity, you cannot >  represent any value larger than 4294967295. > > > What Was What Was Wanted. >