mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Cc: nicolinc@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, jsnitsel@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	santosh.shukla@amd.com, sairaj.arunkodilkar@amd.com,
	jon.grimm@amd.com, prashanthpra@google.com, wvw@google.com,
	wnliu@google.com, gptran@google.com, kpsingh@google.com,
	joao.m.martins@oracle.com, alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/amd: Refactor logic to program the host page table in DTE
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 22:56:38 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <62ba61a5-d172-400e-beb5-e593297129ef@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023130833.GF262900@nvidia.com>

Jason,


On 10/23/2025 6:38 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 01:43:23AM +0000, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> @@ -2088,37 +2104,28 @@ static void set_dte_entry(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
>>  	else
>>  		domid = domain->id;
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * When SNP is enabled, we can only support TV=1 with non-zero domain ID.
>>  	 * This is prevented by the SNP-enable and IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY check in
>>  	 * do_iommu_domain_alloc().
>>  	 */
>>  	WARN_ON(amd_iommu_snp_en && (domid == 0));
>>  
>> +	amd_iommu_make_clear_dte(dev_data, &new);
>>  
>> +	old_domid = READ_ONCE(dte->data[1]) & DTE_DOMID_MASK;
> 
> This old_domid stuff doesn't make any sense. I think the commit that
> added it is bonkers: 36b7200f67df ("iommu/amd: Flush old domains in kdump kernel")
> 
> The problem is that the dom ids that are present in the re-used DTE
> table have to be reserved from the domain id alloctor at boot.
> > If the kdump kernel tries to create new DTEs it MUST NOT re-use any
> IDs that are actively being using in DTEs already or you get data
> corruption. Randomly flushing IDs is just getting lucky..

Good catch. Thanks!

Looks like commit 38e5f33ee359 ("iommu/amd: Reuse device table for kdump") broke
domain ID reservation in kdump path :-( We will fix it.


> 
> Not for this series, but something to think about.
> 
>> +	if (gcr3_info && gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl)
>> +		set_dte_gcr3_table(dev_data, &new);
>> +	else if (domain->iop.mode != PAGE_MODE_NONE)
>> +		amd_iommu_set_dte_v1(dev_data, domain, &new);
>>  
>> +	/* Note: The IR, IW, TV, DOMID are needed for both v1 and gcr3 table */
>> +	new.data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_IR | DTE_FLAG_IW | DTE_FLAG_TV;
>> +	new.data[1] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_DOMID_MASK, domid);
>>  
>> +	if (dev_data->ats_enabled)
>> +		new.data[1] |= DTE_FLAG_IOTLB;
> 
> These three should be merged into the two functions so they stand
> alone. These sets have to be made in the next patch, doesn't make
> sense to open code them in callers.
> 
> Like this, it is simple and readable. It directly answers the question
> 'what bits are set when the driver creates this kind of DTE'
> 
> static void set_dte_gcr3_table(struct amd_iommu *iommu,
> 			       struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
> 			       struct dev_table_entry *target)
> {
> 	struct gcr3_tbl_info *gcr3_info = &dev_data->gcr3_info;
> 	u64 gcr3 = iommu_virt_to_phys(gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl);
> 
> 	target->data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_IR | DTE_FLAG_IW | DTE_FLAG_TV |
> 			   DTE_FLAG_GV | FIELD_PREP(DTE_GLX, gcr3_info->glx) |
> 			   FIELD_PREP(DTE_GCR3_14_12, gcr3 >> 12) |
> 			   (dev_data->ats_enabled ? DTE_FLAG_IOTLB : 0) |
> 			   (pdom_is_v2_pgtbl_mode(dev_data->domain) ?
> 				    target->data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_GIOV :
> 				    0);
> 
> 	target->data[1] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_GCR3_30_15, gcr3 >> 15) |
> 			   FIELD_PREP(DTE_GCR3_51_31, gcr3 >> 31) |
> 			   FIELD_PREP(DTE_DOMID_MASK, dev_data->gcr3_info.domid);
> 
> 	/* Guest page table can only support 4 and 5 levels  */
> 	if (amd_iommu_gpt_level == PAGE_MODE_5_LEVEL)
> 		target->data[2] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_GPT_LEVEL_MASK, GUEST_PGTABLE_5_LEVEL);
> 	else
> 		target->data[2] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_GPT_LEVEL_MASK, GUEST_PGTABLE_4_LEVEL);
> }
> 
> void amd_iommu_set_dte_v1(struct iommu_dev_data *dev_data,
> 			  struct protection_domain *domain,
> 			  struct dev_table_entry *new)
> {
> 	u64 htrp = iommu_virt_to_phys(domain->iop.root);
> 
> 	new->data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_IR | DTE_FLAG_IW | DTE_FLAG_TV |
> 			FIELD_PREP(DTE_MODE_MASK, domain->iop.mode) |
> 			FIELD_PREP(DTE_HOST_TRP, htrp >> 12) |
> 			(dev_data->ats_enabled ? DTE_FLAG_IOTLB : 0) |
> 			(domain->dirty_tracking ? DTE_FLAG_HAD : 0);
> 	new.data[1] |= FIELD_PREP(DTE_DOMID_MASK, domain->id);
> }
> 
> (It is nice to sort the fields by the spec order, I didn't do that)
> 
> Looks like an identity one is needed too:
> 
> void set_dte_identity(struct dev_table_entry *new)
> {
> 	new->data[0] |= DTE_FLAG_IR | DTE_FLAG_IW | DTE_FLAG_TV |
> 			(dev_data->ats_enabled ? DTE_FLAG_IOTLB : 0);
> }
> 
> Then the whole function is pretty much just:
> 
> 	amd_iommu_make_clear_dte(dev_data, &new);
> 	if (gcr3_info && gcr3_info->gcr3_tbl)
> 		set_dte_gcr3_table(dev_data, &new);
> 	else if (domain->domain.type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY)
> 		set_dte_identity(&new)
> 	else if (domain->domain.type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_PAGING && io.mode == V1)
> 		amd_iommu_set_dte_v1(dev_data, domain, &new);
> 	else
> 		WARN_ON(true);
> 
> ?
> 
> (though how does IDENTITY on a device with a PASID installed work?)

Probably set_dte_identity() should call  set_dte_gcr3_table () and update
relevant fields.

-Vasant


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-08 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-21  1:43 [PATCH v4 00/16] iommu/amd: Introduce Nested Translation support Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/amd: Rename DEV_DOMID_MASK to DTE_DOMID_MASK Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:25   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_pdom_id_alloc() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:24   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_pdom_id_free() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:26   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_device_flush_dte() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:27   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_update_dte256() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:27   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_make_clear_dte() non-static inline Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:27   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/amd: Make amd_iommu_completion_wait() non-static Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:32   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommufd: Introduce data struct for AMD nested domain allocation Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-11-08 17:30   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/amd: Always enable GCR3TRPMode when supported Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-23  2:24   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-11-08 17:39   ` Vasant Hegde
2025-11-11 13:59     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/amd: Add support for nest parent domain allocation Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-23  2:27   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-23 20:08     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/amd: Introduce struct amd_iommu_viommu Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-22 20:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23  2:33   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/amd: Add support for nested domain allocation Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-22 20:01   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/amd: Track host Domain ID mapping for each guest Domain ID Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-22 20:08   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-05 10:50     ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-11-05 13:35       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/amd: Refactor persistent DTE bits programming into amd_iommu_make_clear_dte() Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-23  2:49   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/amd: Refactor logic to program the host page table in DTE Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-23 13:08   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-08 17:26     ` Vasant Hegde [this message]
2025-11-08 23:03       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-11-12 18:40         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2025-11-17 18:08           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-21  1:43 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/amd: Add support for nested domain attach/detach Suravee Suthikulpanit
2025-10-23 13:17   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=62ba61a5-d172-400e-beb5-e593297129ef@amd.com \
    --to=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
    --cc=alejandro.j.jimenez@oracle.com \
    --cc=gptran@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=prashanthpra@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sairaj.arunkodilkar@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=wnliu@google.com \
    --cc=wvw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome