From: "Khan, Imran" <kimran@codeaurora.org>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: "\"axboe"@kernel.dk, akinobu.mita@gmail.com, axboe@fb.com,
hch@lst.de, "tom.leiming\""@gmail.com,
"\"linux-block"@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel\""@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Query] increased latency observed in cpu hotplug path
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:58:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62d2e666-1ae3-f320-013d-e2cfc98770b8@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC5umyi46+iiKS=924xOdVj4++qPgfXkjM-hqg+e68LPDM2izQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/30/2016 7:54 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2016-07-28 22:18 GMT+09:00 Khan, Imran <kimran@codeaurora.org>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently we have observed some increased latency in CPU hotplug
>> event in CPU online path. For online latency we see that block
>> layer is executing notification handler for CPU_UP_PREPARE event
>> and this in turn waits for RCU grace period resulting (sometimes)
>> in an execution time of 15-20 ms for this notification handler.
>> This change was not there in 3.18 kernel but is present in 4.4
>> kernel and was introduced by following commit:
>>
>>
>> commit 5778322e67ed34dc9f391a4a5cbcbb856071ceba
>> Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun Sep 27 02:09:23 2015 +0900
>>
>> blk-mq: avoid inserting requests before establishing new mapping
>
> ...
>
>> Upon reverting this commit I could see an improvement of 15-20 ms in
>> online latency. So I am looking for some help in analyzing the effects
>> of reverting this or should some other approach to reduce the online
>> latency must be taken.
>
> Can you observe the difference in online latency by removing
> get_online_cpus() and put_online_cpus() pair in blk_mq_init_allocated_queue()
> instead of full reverting the commit?
>
Hi Akinobu,
I tried your suggestion but could not achieve any improvement. Actually the snippet that is causing the change in latency is the following one :
list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node) {
blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(q);
/*
* timeout handler can't touch hw queue during the
* reinitialization
*/
del_timer_sync(&q->timeout);
}
I understand that this is getting executed now for CPU_UP_PREPARE as well resulting in
increased latency in the cpu online path. I am trying to reduce this latency while keeping the
purpose of this commit intact. I would welcome further suggestions/feedback in this regard.
--
Imran Khan
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a\nmember of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-01 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-28 13:18 Khan, Imran
[not found] ` <CAC5umyi46+iiKS=924xOdVj4++qPgfXkjM-hqg+e68LPDM2izQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-08-01 9:28 ` Khan, Imran [this message]
2016-08-05 7:19 ` Khan, Imran
2016-08-16 5:53 ` Khan, Imran
2016-08-17 16:47 ` Khan, Imran
[not found] <CAC5umyj04kkoufz3me17Xqk_b-eqxPqocJHmRAKr+UkBawV+xQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <34042993-30f9-81e0-622d-9cd4283624b4@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <65516437-cf7a-4728-50d1-6d3c4b5a9adc@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <faa0cfa9-46e5-f580-654c-5ec7dcc8f977@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <7364b95c-a2ef-4c5c-d593-9cdd4501bcc4@codeaurora.org>
[not found] ` <CAC5umygHWDE4t77o29XdVgqNrurHgy+JwpFuc2RDUn2uLRXPTg@mail.gmail.com>
2016-09-22 10:06 ` Khan, Imran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62d2e666-1ae3-f320-013d-e2cfc98770b8@codeaurora.org \
--to=kimran@codeaurora.org \
--cc="\"axboe"@kernel.dk \
--cc="\"linux-block"@vger.kernel.org \
--cc="linux-kernel\""@vger.kernel.org \
--cc="tom.leiming\""@gmail.com \
--cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome