From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755877Ab0CDLgs (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:36:48 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.220.219]:63697 "EHLO mail-fx0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755823Ab0CDLgq convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 06:36:46 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hMs+fxYi7OzFrXFUD2caUXSRCMPCrrbpZpzY5/r4tuxx0gI8mTC3FUH4c+xZw6wbiQ UrZOl8xhYjkbB6Xj0o0KkB0gPzetqctIqf6RqyQTNAsEZ7gprYm+tIDMOzZ2da1tz+TZ IYuFFJsDhWgAHYqI5xoLqJxNuF+jZ+ANcSohg= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B8F974A.4090001@redhat.com> References: <1820d69d1003030445n18b35839r407d4d277b1bf48d@mail.gmail.com> <62e5edd41003030517g6fa9b64awdf18578d6c5db7e@mail.gmail.com> <4B8F974A.4090001@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:36:44 +0100 Message-ID: <62e5edd41003040336x16253369ycb1905a9938432db@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Gspca USB driver zc3xx and STV06xx probe the same device .. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Erik_Andr=E9n?= To: Hans de Goede Cc: LKML , Jean-Francois Moine , Linux Media Mailing List , Gabriel C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2010/3/4 Hans de Goede : > Hi, > > On 03/03/2010 02:17 PM, Erik Andrén wrote: >> >> 2010/3/3 Gabriel C: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I own a QuickCam Messanger webcam.. I didn't used it in ages but today >>> I plugged it in.. >>> ( Device 002: ID 046d:08da Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Messanger ) >>> >>> Now zc3xx and stv06xx are starting both to probe the device .. In >>> 2.6.33 that result in a not working webcam. >>> ( rmmod both&&  modprobe zc3xx one seems to fix that ) >>> >>> On current git head zc3xx works fine even when both are probing the >>> device. >>> >>> Also I noticed stv06xx fails anyway for my webcam with this error: >>> .... >>> >>> [  360.910243] STV06xx: Configuring camera >>> [  360.910244] STV06xx: st6422 sensor detected >>> [  360.910245] STV06xx: Initializing camera >>> [  361.161948] STV06xx: probe of 6-1:1.0 failed with error -32 >>> [  361.161976] usbcore: registered new interface driver STV06xx >>> [  361.161978] STV06xx: registered >>> ..... >>> >>> Next thing is stv06xx tells it is an st6422 sensor and does not work >>> with it while zc3xx tells it is an HV7131R(c) sensor and works fine >>> with it. >>> >>> What is right ? >> >> Hans, >> As you added support for the st6422 sensor to the stv06xx subdriver I >> imagine you best know what's going on. >> > > I took the USB-ID in question from the out of tree v4l1 driver I was basing > my > st6422 work on. Looking at the other ID's (which are very close together) > and > combining that with this bug report, I think it is safe to say that the > USB-ID > in question should be removed from the stv06xx driver. > > Erik will you handle this, or shall I ? > Either way is fine by me. I can try to do it tonight. Best regards, ERik > Regards, > > Hans >