From: "Marcos Pinto" <markybob@gmail.com>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@stusta.de>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
"Alan Cox" <alan@redhat.com>, "Greg KH" <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.20.7 locking up hard on boot
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:11:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62eb359a0704241211i2effccc8r9a1d352281b6cbd7@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62eb359a0704231558we55f553u44a77183ed3e5340@mail.gmail.com>
I can confirm that reverting commit
7639e962234c76031d1ddf436def7fd9602be560 fixes the problem. Also,
there seem to be plenty of other people reporting the same boot
locking:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/msg/cc0453677be44a9e
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=245313
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/6845
http://www.usenetlinux.com/archive/topic.php/t-757515.html
Please consider reverting this patch in upstream.
Thank you for your time,
Marcos
On 4/23/07, Marcos Pinto <markybob@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
> > Given that all of the reports are in cases when the adjustment is *not*
> > being done (and only a message is being printed), I can only assume that
> > the breakage results from the adding of PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO
> > into the resource flags. I considered this unconditional setting of the flags
> > odd already in the original code, and added this extra flag only for
> > consistency reasons (because the settings reported by X indicated that
> > this was missing). Perhaps the adjustment (original and the added
> > extra flag) shouldn't be done if IORESOURCE_IO wasn't already set.
> > Perhaps one of those seeing the issue could try out returning from the
> > function right after that printk(), without any adjustment to the flags.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-21 0:47 Marcos Pinto
2007-04-21 1:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-21 4:30 ` Marcos Pinto
2007-04-21 5:34 ` Greg KH
2007-04-21 10:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-21 10:54 ` Marcos Pinto
2007-04-22 2:00 ` Len Brown
2007-04-21 12:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-04-23 8:06 ` Jan Beulich
2007-04-23 22:58 ` Marcos Pinto
2007-04-24 19:11 ` Marcos Pinto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62eb359a0704241211i2effccc8r9a1d352281b6cbd7@mail.gmail.com \
--to=markybob@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®