From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7CFD2206A9; Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757586515; cv=none; b=CX/IxqqIRD1upnDfomrYCfAHzxRxjB97NG4AUtFqwkcRZkdhaEYFNdLyf0c4kVjmFP69qMvEKUb6aqW2rrB3P51YG+DjRT96OhPCp/wFZ58qgUL9BBnezEUjJMu0UHemyu/5tcaxrqBpY+rzBXXFbgkAIH+3ksiORKbj5msgpg4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757586515; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4mdqsA9BzJF/pZg/fnVA3G+Thh4lO9JU6WzDhpS/kco=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mJijk3uKiEhTDHbS+TfnqjHbCm/EbvyGP+xI3Yee2SwemeEu/bmlyyRZUlx/7fXqrk8Yo5+2xOyUAhwzZr91kT+vmL85YDc7E1iWd//NvmBIbMX/OwA4Hm5eqiRMRUGQz/psi7MPMXPt5cVGGRCTKY3Fcbn7JwYjw+dp3verf8E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=juZ+ZaqW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="juZ+ZaqW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1757586514; x=1789122514; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=4mdqsA9BzJF/pZg/fnVA3G+Thh4lO9JU6WzDhpS/kco=; b=juZ+ZaqWTMy/DKR/jY0hqfZsQAXpmp51tFgzKH1thg95V0jJxkG1mida +KfX2d+d+EzCGf1sfNdRYUZGpe3vmJMEYvf/RsmtqfpsFv6cXAq7/oRl6 clOo1LBH6nPhwesaoWrZI0SFbRxr2XwH+ymA9J3ure9mAUp4RXRXY+nlC UdggkmxLoVTuCZwGLCxbK1wGipn1VmkFOUqJGysqy6vXc6pFKDCEiE7g6 MrrV2A3WbtyzYe4VRxLJLIzh7jiMCCFZbmhqlmO4SbTXaqeKSEBZNglCc lXfE1wfCdcqC9P9naWlo+VYt22gibyIZGLBhA7+dZe+0XBTqIG9+E0vKx w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lw9RAueSTRWm1B8YTPeQog== X-CSE-MsgGUID: iKM+93bURmmVn3Ui+ED3OA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11549"; a="85356537" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,257,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="85356537" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2025 03:28:33 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NgzwDza4ThaqBgE10jcOIg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZYcUKkyIRE+1lCbHSGefbA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from slindbla-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.246.136]) by fmviesa003-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2025 03:28:31 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/19] tools/docs: python_version: move version check from sphinx-pre-install In-Reply-To: <20250910142427.61347215@foz.lan> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <784ca5070326558220cc275deaa046a274badebe.1756969623.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> <12f948d2bb995d9321ce07d8765e00bcbd822402@intel.com> <20250910142427.61347215@foz.lan> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 13:28:28 +0300 Message-ID: <62eddeec2ac82b6631957a8ce1dea330fd6862f7@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 10 Sep 2025, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:14:33 +0300 > Jani Nikula escreveu: > >> On Thu, 04 Sep 2025, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> > + # Restart script using the newer version >> >> I thought the whole idea of restarting was completely rejected by >> approximately everyone?! > > This patch is just moving the code. There is a patch after this one > changing the behavior. Shouldn't we fix that kind of problems first, instead of refactoring? -- Jani Nikula, Intel