From: Evgenii Shatokhin <e.shatokhin@yadro.com>
To: Andy Chiu <andybnac@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<llvm@lists.linux.dev>, <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
<puranjay12@gmail.com>, <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
<yongxuan.wang@sifive.com>, <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
<nick.hu@sifive.com>, <nylon.chen@sifive.com>,
<tommy.wu@sifive.com>, <eric.lin@sifive.com>,
<viccent.chen@sifive.com>, <zong.li@sifive.com>,
<samuel.holland@sifive.com>, <linux@yadro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] riscv: ftrace: atmoic patching and preempt improvements
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 10:58:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62f06687-a20d-4f55-b22d-52af707b528a@yadro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241127172908.17149-1-andybnac@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 27.11.2024 20:29, Andy Chiu wrote:
> This series makes atmoic code patching possible in riscv ftrace. A
> direct benefit of this is that we can get rid of stop_machine() when
> patching function entries. This also makes it possible to run ftrace
> with full kernel preemption. Before this series, the kernel initializes
> patchable function entries to NOP4 + NOP4. To start tracing, it updates
> entries to AUIPC + JALR while holding other cores in stop_machine.
> stop_machine() is required because it is impossible to update 2
> instructions, and be seen atomically. And preemption must have to be
> prevented, as kernel preemption allows process to be scheduled out while
> executing on one of these instruction pairs.
>
> This series addresses the problem by initializing the first NOP4 to
> AUIPC. So, atmoic patching is possible because the kernel only has to
> update one instruction. As long as the instruction is naturally aligned,
> then it is expected to be updated atomically.
>
> However, the address range of the ftrace trampoline is limited to +-2K
> from ftrace_caller after appplying this series. This issue is expected
> to be solved by Puranjay's CALL_OPS, where it adds 8B naturally align
> data in front of pacthable functions and can use it to direct execution
> out to any custom trampolines.
>
> The series is composed by three parts. The first part cleans up the
> existing issues when the kernel is compiled with clang.The second part
> modifies the ftrace code patching mechanism (2-4) as mentioned above.
> Then prepare ftrace to be able to run with kernel preemption (5,6)
>
> An ongoing fix:
>
> Since there is no room for marking *kernel_text_address as notrace[1] at
> source code level, there is a significant performance regression when
> using function_graph with TRACE_IRQFLAGS enabled. There can be as much as
> 8 graph handler being called in each function-entry. The current
> workaround requires us echo "*kernel_text_address" into
> set_ftrace_notrace before starting the trace. However, we observed that
> the kernel still enables the patch site in some cases even with
> *kernel_text_address properly added in the file While the root cause is
> still under investagtion, we consider that it should not be the reason
> for holding back the code patching, in order to unblock the call_ops
> part.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240613093233.0b349ed0@rorschach.local.home/
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Add a fix tag for patch 1
> - Add a data fence before sending out remote fence.i (6)
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240628-dev-andyc-dyn-ftrace-v4-v2-0-1e5f4cb1f049@sifive.com/
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop patch 1 as it is merged through fixes.
> - Drop patch 2, which converts kernel_text_address into notrace. As
> users can prevent tracing it by configuring the tracefs.
> - Use a more generic way in kconfig to align functions.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240613-dev-andyc-dyn-ftrace-v4-v1-0-1a538e12c01e@sifive.com
>
>
> Andy Chiu (7):
> riscv: ftrace: support fastcc in Clang for WITH_ARGS
> riscv: ftrace: align patchable functions to 4 Byte boundary
> riscv: ftrace: prepare ftrace for atomic code patching
> riscv: ftrace: do not use stop_machine to update code
> riscv: vector: Support calling schedule() for preemptible Vector
> riscv: add a data fence for CMODX in the kernel mode
> riscv: ftrace: support PREEMPT
>
> arch/riscv/Kconfig | 4 +-
> arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 11 +++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h | 5 ++
> arch/riscv/include/asm/vector.h | 22 ++++-
> arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 7 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/ftrace.c | 133 ++++++++++++-----------------
> arch/riscv/kernel/mcount-dyn.S | 25 ++++--
> arch/riscv/mm/cacheflush.c | 15 +++-
> 8 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 0eb512779d642b21ced83778287a0f7a3ca8f2a1
> --
> 2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
I have tested this series in a QEMU VM (-machine virt) with the
preemptible kernels, CONFIG_PREEMPT=y.
No issues have been revealed so far.
One of the kernels was built by GCC 13.2.0 (with the patch for minimum
alignment added on top of it), the other - with LLVM 17.0.6.
In both cases, the basic boottime tests for Ftrace passed.
Switching tracers between nop, function, function_graph and blk in a
loop in parallel with stress-ng and with network load for several hours
did not reveal any problems either. Kernel crashes happened in this
scenario a year ago, but now it runs clean, good!
Function redirection via Ftrace seems to work OK too.
The size of .text section increased slightly after this series, by 0.35%
- 0.38%, probably because of function alignment:
* 12075 KB => 12121 KB (GCC)
* 12167 KB => 12209 KB (LLVM/clang)
Not sure, how to test the vector-related part though, "[PATCH v3 5/7]
riscv: vector: Support calling schedule() for preemptible Vector"
For all other patches in the series:
Tested-by: Evgenii Shatokhin <e.shatokhin@yadro.com>
Regards,
Evgenii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-27 17:29 Andy Chiu
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] riscv: ftrace: support fastcc in Clang for WITH_ARGS Andy Chiu
2024-12-03 12:05 ` Björn Töpel
2024-12-03 14:44 ` Evgenii Shatokhin
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] riscv: ftrace: align patchable functions to 4 Byte boundary Andy Chiu
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] riscv: ftrace: prepare ftrace for atomic code patching Andy Chiu
2024-12-01 15:31 ` Evgenii Shatokhin
2024-12-02 7:29 ` Evgenii Shatokhin
2024-12-06 10:02 ` Björn Töpel
2024-12-06 23:35 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2024-12-09 14:57 ` Robbin Ehn
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] riscv: ftrace: do not use stop_machine to update code Andy Chiu
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] riscv: vector: Support calling schedule() for preemptible Vector Andy Chiu
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] riscv: add a data fence for CMODX in the kernel mode Andy Chiu
2025-03-10 19:08 ` Björn Töpel
2025-03-11 12:44 ` Andrea Parri
2025-03-11 14:53 ` Björn Töpel
2025-03-11 18:11 ` Andrea Parri
2025-03-13 18:12 ` Andy Chiu
2025-03-14 15:23 ` Andrea Parri
2024-11-27 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] riscv: ftrace: support PREEMPT Andy Chiu
2025-03-10 19:09 ` Björn Töpel
2024-11-27 21:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] riscv: ftrace: atmoic patching and preempt improvements Björn Töpel
2024-12-24 3:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-12-29 19:08 ` Andy Chiu
2025-01-06 15:22 ` Andy Chiu
2024-12-02 7:58 ` Evgenii Shatokhin [this message]
2024-12-11 15:38 ` Andy Chiu
2024-12-03 12:18 ` Björn Töpel
2024-12-03 15:09 ` Evgenii Shatokhin
2024-12-06 8:39 ` Björn Töpel
2024-12-11 15:48 ` Andy Chiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62f06687-a20d-4f55-b22d-52af707b528a@yadro.com \
--to=e.shatokhin@yadro.com \
--cc=alexghiti@rivosinc.com \
--cc=andybnac@gmail.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=bjorn@rivosinc.com \
--cc=eric.lin@sifive.com \
--cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@yadro.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nick.hu@sifive.com \
--cc=nylon.chen@sifive.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=puranjay12@gmail.com \
--cc=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=tommy.wu@sifive.com \
--cc=viccent.chen@sifive.com \
--cc=yongxuan.wang@sifive.com \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®