Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] pinctrl: Add new pinctrl/GPIO driver

["Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Mika,

On 13/9/2019 4:18 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 11:11:32AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>>
>> thanks for your patches!
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:59 AM Rahul Tanwar
>> <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This series is to add pinctrl & GPIO controller driver for a new SoC.
>>> Patch 1 adds pinmux & GPIO controller driver.
>>> Patch 2 adds the dt bindings document & include file.
>>>
>>> Patches are against Linux 5.3-rc5 at below Git tree:
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
>> OK nice, I think you need to include Mika Westerberg on this review
>> as well, because I think he likes to stay on top of all things intel
>> in pin control. (Also included two other Intel folks in Finland who usually
>> take an interest in these things.)
> Thanks Linus for looping me in.
>
> Even if this is not directly based on the stuff we have under
> drivers/pinctrl/intel/*, I have a couple of comments. I don't have this
> patch series in my inbox so I'm commenting here.
>
> Since the driver name is equilibrium I suggest you to name
> intel_pinctrl_driver and the like (probe, remove) to follow that
> convention to avoid confusing this with the Intel pinctrl drivers under
> drivers/pinctrl/intel/*.
>
> Maybe use eqbr prefix so then intel_pinctrl_driver becomes
> eqbr_pinctrl_driver and so on. Also all the structures like
> intel_pinctrl_drv_data should be changed accordingly.
>
> Ditto for:
>
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Pinctrl Driver for LGM SoC");
>
> I think better would be:
>
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Pinctrl Driver for LGM SoC (Equilibrium)");
>
> Anyway you get the idea :)

Yes, i understand your point. Will update in v2. Thanks.

Regards,
Rahul