From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, roger.pau@citrix.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/blkfront: When purging persistent grants, keep them in the buffer
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2018 17:48:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <63d2a50f-c22e-1b99-8354-7feca9e089e5@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d3d7e32-22d1-83aa-af0a-7ed6e628f5e5@kernel.dk>
On 9/27/18 5:37 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 9/27/18 2:33 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 27/09/18 21:06, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 9/27/18 2:56 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 9/27/18 12:52 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>>> On 27/09/18 16:26, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/27/18 1:12 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>>>> On 22/09/18 21:55, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>>>>>> Commit a46b53672b2c ("xen/blkfront: cleanup stale persistent grants")
>>>>>>>> added support for purging persistent grants when they are not in use. As
>>>>>>>> part of the purge, the grants were removed from the grant buffer, This
>>>>>>>> eventually causes the buffer to become empty, with BUG_ON triggered in
>>>>>>>> get_free_grant(). This can be observed even on an idle system, within
>>>>>>>> 20-30 minutes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should keep the grants in the buffer when purging, and only free the
>>>>>>>> grant ref.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fixes: a46b53672b2c ("xen/blkfront: cleanup stale persistent grants")
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>>>>>> Since Konrad is out, I'm going to queue this up for 4.19.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Boris/Juergen.
>>>>>
>>>>> Last week i tested a linux-4.19-rc4 kernel with xen-next and this patch from Boris pulled on top.
>>>>> Unfortunately it made a VM hang (probably because it's rootFS is shuffled from under it's feet
>>> What do you mean by "rootFS is shuffled from under it's feet " ?
>> Assumption that block-front getting borked and either a kernel crash or rootfs becoming mounted readonly. Didn't (try) to check though.
>>
>>>>> and it gave these in dom0 dmesg:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 9251.696090] xen-blkback: requesting a grant already in use
>>>>> [ 9251.705861] xen-blkback: trying to add a gref that's already in the tree
>>>>> [ 9251.715781] xen-blkback: requesting a grant already in use
>>>>> [ 9251.725756] xen-blkback: trying to add a gref that's already in the tree
>>>>> [ 9251.735698] xen-blkback: requesting a grant already in use
>>>>> [ 9251.745573] xen-blkback: trying to add a gref that's already in the tree
>>>>>
>>>>> The VM was a HVM with 4 vcpu's and 2 phy disks:
>>>>> xen-blkback: backend/vbd/14/768: using 4 queues, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) persistent grants
>>>>> xen-blkback: backend/vbd/14/832: using 4 queues, protocol 1 (x86_64-abi) persistent grants
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently i have been running 4.19-rc5 with xen-next on top and commit
>>>>> a46b53672b2c reverted, for a couple of days. That seems to run stable
>>>>> for me (since it's a small box so i'm not hit by what a46b53672b2c
>>>>> tried to fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can come up with a debug patch i can give that a spin tomorrow
>>>>> evening or in the weekend, so we are hopefully still in time for the
>>>>> 4.19 release.
>>>> At this late in the game, might make more sense to simply revert the
>>>> buggy commit. Especially since what is currently out there doesn't fix
>>>> the issue for you.
>> Don't know if Boris or Juergen have a hunch about the issue, if not
>> perhaps a revert is the best.
> Anyone? Unless I hear otherwise, I'll revert the series tomorrow.
Juergen may have something to say by tomorrow, but from my perspective,
given that we are coming up on rc6 --- yes.
I looked at the patches again and didn't see anything obvious.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-27 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-22 19:55 Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-27 7:12 ` Juergen Gross
2018-09-27 14:26 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-27 18:52 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2018-09-27 18:56 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-27 19:06 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-09-27 19:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-27 20:33 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2018-09-27 21:37 ` Jens Axboe
2018-09-27 21:48 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2018-09-27 22:03 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2018-09-28 6:44 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=63d2a50f-c22e-1b99-8354-7feca9e089e5@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®