From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-43103.protonmail.ch (mail-43103.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102613D75AD for ; Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.103 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786914579; cv=none; b=SPHS7rRaxVJM+cserL+YU7VSGYZA2JkzO4om5UnvdCLhHFhEnz8G2YFlGX8eMU+/EPlvQQajC0ZxxWk1FEQbRAxqKDPTSP2s4slms29ChTbBEs//jqt2Bz6pBnThbACrNXKBQFkrd681j+TARHHE74Up9/Wi9egno2PG5gUK27g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786914579; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Uj/dU++QgsXJZiCHN91cmenO1QUkSucty5TYoC27qhA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Wg5dlhPewRVBgawytKJGWcmswAm6PkYQCogphn1uhsWd2MnKfcAKIRTVHejTkTfzKL+09R/WEd7OsdOLi6QhPu2QxMovXSrVRL9A3E4UbuQF/C7wvHVt8FVtKg47Uz340NtWa0xunUKbCWjPkDv4shdz/pFER1aKaSc49RWUs+M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=RpTEfKed; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.103 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="RpTEfKed" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1786914564; x=1787173764; bh=Uj/dU++QgsXJZiCHN91cmenO1QUkSucty5TYoC27qhA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=RpTEfKedUI8QgMpvHxLemEHZ2aJQ2yFkiJt+j3twPmxFMUa3xYa2ITcR7IrDleB5q juS0gtoyu9WqkVmoWpZtEW6dA7YZ1FJVEPWZxy5oztugNjJHhteF1bMbC+PND8EP5F 8gzNjoqDDoRi4/y0zxot6exOoqjRrEhxHNMtbX8pwLkncnkys5dCWtjGmhUKNvY9rN Pb7VfoU5ctdozr+DR/cY+YV0FrbPaomLU73oCH1jNxi6gWVdj3Epv5BVzbrrKv+b8g ZTcc+Ey+Vvqslw4KGptkQZdQSrOvsaFBjkbejcvHLNqKG1+9IMoOWXtEFi3RmOozDd C4ZivekBkMA2g== Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2026 21:09:19 +0000 To: Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley From: Esteban Urrutia Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: qcom,pmic-glink: Add compatible string for SM8475 Message-ID: <63ddcd44-23fd-45e5-be71-e4a13a4deff3@proton.me> In-Reply-To: <20260802-sm8475-pmic-glink-v3-1-45216e6ec572@proton.me> References: <20260802-sm8475-pmic-glink-v3-1-45216e6ec572@proton.me> Feedback-ID: 147889766:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: e41530e26a7b9c512048acb291e820bd92ae546d Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/2/26 2:39 AM, Esteban Urrutia via B4 Relay wrote: > SM8475 is compatible with SM8450 with respect to pmic-glink support. > Add a compatible string for SM8475 using SM8450 as a fallback. Any chance on this commit being picked? Regards, Esteban