From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763603AbXGMUNR (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:13:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757584AbXGMUNH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:13:07 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:52439 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756765AbXGMUNG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:13:06 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Mike Anderson Cc: device-mapper development , Matt Mackall , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon Subject: Re: [dm-devel] Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 13/18] dm: netlink In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:59 PDT." <20070713020059.GA5402@us.ibm.com> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20070711210137.GE24114@agk.fab.redhat.com> <20070711142712.e646995b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070712231920.GZ11166@waste.org> <20070712163115.ee686f8d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070713020059.GA5402@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1184357578_3376P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:12:58 -0400 Message-ID: <6408.1184357578@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1184357578_3376P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:00:59 PDT, Mike Anderson said: > No, all admin tools and interfaces function as they do today. The > dm-netlink patch series only contains 9 deletions (actual just one true > deletion of existing kernel code the others are due to break up of the > patch into compilable chunks). The intent was not to break users or force > migration. OK, I'll bite - if the admin tools function as before, who is *using* the code? Or do the admin tools have a preferred netlink component and a fallback set of code if that fails? --==_Exmh_1184357578_3376P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFGl9zKcC3lWbTT17ARAn1TAJwK7uClY988U38VvooewVlui/+RpwCg3cJr DTxUbQjXfXFwFebgArnL3KM= =DJ4I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1184357578_3376P--