From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264401AbTL3XwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:52:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265860AbTL3XwR (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:52:17 -0500 Received: from magic-mail.adaptec.com ([216.52.22.10]:39042 "EHLO magic.adaptec.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264401AbTL3XwM (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:52:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:57:49 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Reply-To: "Justin T. Gibbs" To: Jeff Garzik , Mickael Marchand cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] adaptec 1210sa Message-ID: <641152704.1072828669@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <3FF20B7A.1090108@pobox.com> References: <200312220305.29955.marchand@kde.org> <3FF20B7A.1090108@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> the idea suggested by Justin was to clear bits 6 and 7 at 0x8a of pci >> configuration space. (which I hope did fine :) >> >> Thanks Justin :) > > > Does the aar1210 have a different PCI id? That would make it easy to > distinguish, and thus easy to selectively apply your patch only to Adaptec > chipsets that need it. The change is harmless for controllers using non-adaptec BIOSes. You'll find that on these other controllers, the interrupt masks are already clear. If this wasn't the case, the current Linux driver wouldn't work even on stock boards. -- Justin